Connect with us

GROpinion

Good Governance Value Chain: the path to returning power to the people in Nigeria

Published

on

Brands that break into the market have a unique selling point. Brand promoters/marketers spend a lot of time in conducting market research in order to determine customer preferences. Such survey guides in the production of products that satisfy customers and at the same time attract revenue to the brand owners. Most products that have today become market kings are all products of sustained market research and innovation. That is why there are fundamental questions upon which the production of goods and services are premised, which include: what, how, who and to whom to produce. It is in having an effective answer to those questions of production that proper value chain analysis is organized.

Inasmuch as value chain analysis is a good economic tool, it nonetheless applies in all areas of life. In this essay, we want to explore the benefits of value chain proposition in politics, and apply same in taking stock of the involvement of the people in the governance process. The assumption of this piece of writing is that a wrongly analyzed value chain will on the long run bring about unwholesome products and services that bring loss upon the producer as their will be no patronage to such valueless products and services. Further to the assumption of this essay is that no producer or service provider in his/her right senses would embark on production of goods and services that will fail in the market.

In the market place of politics, power is the stock which value all politicians would want to buy as raw material. To process it, the party politics production line is used to produce the final product known as “good governance”. The electorates go to shop for the final product (good governance) during the election. Political parties organize their value chain analysis using the electoral processes to bring into the market a valuable product. The value chain track in party politics follows these lines: formation and registration of a political party with constitution, ideology, manifesto and structures. The political party is always a mass party that thrives through strong membership base. The party also determines the candidates drawn from its faithful members that would fly their flags during the polls. To market these candidates that form the unfinished products processed through the production line, the parties use all the resources of campaigneering to persuade the electorates to cast their votes for the party’s preferred candidates. Voters on their own use the inherent purchasing power of their voter card to patronize the valuable commodity, that is, the candidate(s) with good governance oriented political value.

Nigeria as a country has 36 States and Federal Capital Territory located in Abuja. There are about 30 verified political parties in Nigeria. Both the dominant and non-dominant registered political parties in Nigeria have their production plants in the various states of the Federation. These parties struggle to clinch power at elections organized by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and its state variants (State Electoral Commissions – SECs). From the Local Government Councils, the States through to the Federal, political parties through their candidates vie positions within the executive and the legislature. These political spaces are fully occupied by elected candidates. The question that bothers anyone is whether all these elected candidates and representatives are good finished products? If they are not, how were they produced? And how were they elected by the electorates if at all they were? To answer these questions would require that we look at the good governance value chain proposition as it concerns politics in Nigeria in order to determine if the production processes are thorough. And if not, then, there is the need to proffer solutions that will counter the prevailing narrative.

In Nigeria, it is a common knowledge that candidates that stand for elections are forced on the electorate by party stakeholders or what I may call the powerpreneurs(power brokers). Internal democracy is always thrown away, in preference for guided democracy. Guided democracy creates a Hobson’s choice scenario – a choice of taking what is available or nothing at all – in which the electorates will be faced with bad and unmarketable products ab initio, which they are forced to buy. It is also a common knowledge that majority of the candidates that vie elective positions do not bear the mindset of service to the people, but only jostle positions for personal aggrandizement as the prevailing poverty in Nigeria has created more politicians than needed, who only use politics as a tool for fighting poverty in favour of themselves, family, friends and minions, and nothing more.

What has remained the prevailing experience is finding political office holders in Nigeria involved only in self-serving politicking and never in the interest of those that should have voted them in if the political process had been thorough. They hide away in their thickly tinted SUVs, often bulletproof, with an array of highly equipped security personnel drafted to ensure their safety alone, instead of the generality of the populace who are left to be butchered and hacked down with and by the machetes and guns of the villains, and other merchants of violence. For the legislators, most of their constituency offices remain under lock and key from the day they were inaugurated till the time when they feel they are ready to seek reelection for another term in office. For those who occupy executive positions, what they do is to recycle the obsolete Nigerian pattern of governance that involves payment of overhead and paving few roads, while those they lead stay hungry and jobless. Till date, there is no sustainable development agenda pursued by the Nigerian elite politicians that target the transformation of the entire economy of the country.

What then should be the root cause of this problem? The major cause of the problem is the crisis that bedevils the leadership recruitment process in Nigeria. The so-called godfathers and stakeholders of Nigerian politics foster the politics of patronage and renterism. Many commentators on the ‘Nigerian democracy’ often assigned the problem in the system to leadership failure. But I differ from that view. The problem cannot be with leadership, but with the process of leadership recruitment. It is said that no one can offer or give what one does not have. When wrong persons are selected and imposed upon the people as their leaders through guided democracy, the outcome of such leadership will be ever abysmal. But when the right choices are made, the case turns to a better deal.

How would we lead Nigeria out of leadership recruitment impasse? It is simple. Getting the right thing done remains the only way out. Let me cite an instance from where I will draw a conclusion. Time Magazine on its 23 October, 2006 cover page ran a headline: “WHY BARACK OBAMA COULD BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE US”. The prediction was based on Obama’s leadership track record. As at that time, he was considered ripe to take up the leadership of the US, and indeed he achieved it when he ran for the presidency. Obama was not actually a product of political godfatherism. Rather, he was a product of effective good governance value chain. The right candidate was chosen for the right job. That should be the hallmark of good governance value chain in politics. He had taken several leadership positions and proved his mettle. But down here with us, anyone popularized by the stakeholders would ride roughshod into leadership position, whether he/she is ever qualified or not. What we must do now as a people is to wrestle out power from the stakeholders and return it to the people on whom legitimacy resides. This would require positive, non-violent revolution, and no better weapon than the Ballot Paper through the effective use of the Permanent Voter Card (PVC) would be needed for the task. Political apathy is the only thing that would keep bad governance in circulation. But citizen participation is the only way through which good governance value chain will become a permanent path within the marketplace of Nigerian politics.

 

Written by Herbert Chimezie Nnadi (IgedenwaAfrika)

Lecturer at Imo State Polytechnic and Social/Political Affairs Analyst

GrassRoots.ng is on a critical mission; to objectively and honestly represent the voice of ‘grassrooters’ in International, Federal, State and Local Government fora; heralding the achievements of political and other leaders and investors alike, without discrimination. This daily, digital news publication platform serves as the leading source of up-to-date information on how people and events reflect on the global community. The pragmatic articles reflect on the life of the community people, covering news/current affairs, business, technology, culture and fashion, entertainment, sports, State, National and International issues that directly impact the locals.

GROpinion

Guarding Democracy Beyond Sensationalism: Why the Resolutions of the Lagos State House of Assembly Should not be Politicized

By Olayiwola Rasheed Emmanuel

Published

on

Obasa and Sanwo-Olu and Lagos House of Assembly
Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa, Speaker Lagos State House of Assembly and Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu

The Lagos State House of Assembly, under the firm leadership of Rt. Hon. (Dr.) Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa, once again lived up to its constitutional responsibility on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, when it raised concerns over the worrying practice of political appointees assuming office without legislative confirmation.

To discerning minds, this was no political storm. It was not a rift, neither was it a quarrel between the Executive and the Legislature.

It was, in fact, the Lagos State Legislature performing its core duty under the Nigerian Constitution. Yet, to the surprise of many citizens, some online bloggers hurriedly framed the development with sensational captions such as “Political Storms Rage Again in Lagos State” or “Obasa Sets for Another Showdown with Sanwo-Olu.”

Such misleading framing does more harm than good. It distracts citizens from the essence of governance and creates an illusion of conflict where none exists. Worse still, it undermines the confidence of the people in their democratic institutions by peddling half-truths.

The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) is unequivocal on the requirement for legislative confirmation at the State level:

Section 192(2): “Any appointment to the office of Commissioner of the Government of a State shall, if the nomination of any person to such office is confirmed by the House of Assembly of the State, be made by the Governor of that State.”

Section 196(2): “The Governor shall appoint the Secretary to the Government of the State, Head of the Civil Service of the State, and Commissioners with the confirmation of the House of Assembly of the State.”

Section 126(2): “The Auditor-General for a State shall be appointed by the Governor of the State on the recommendation of the State Civil Service Commission, subject to confirmation by the House of Assembly of the State.”

Section 4(7): further empowers a State House of Assembly to make laws for the peace, order, and good governance of the State.

Section 128(2)(b): authorizes the House to “expose corruption, inefficiency, or waste in the execution or administration of laws within its legislative competence.”

Therefore, when the Lagos State House of Assembly insists that appointees must appear before it for confirmation, it is not engaging in political grandstanding. It is simply upholding the Constitution and safeguarding accountability.

So, one must ask:

Why should political meanings be hastily read into every resolution of the Lagos State House of Assembly whenever it discharges its lawful duties?

Why do certain online media outlets thrive on creating unnecessary friction between the Executive and Legislature; two arms of government that are, in fact, partners in governance under the doctrine of separation of powers?

Should the pursuit of online traffic and sensational headlines come at the expense of truth, clarity, and democratic education?

It is reckless and irresponsible journalism to reduce constitutional duties to mere political theatrics. When that happens, the media ceases to inform and instead begins to mislead, thereby weakening the public’s trust in institutions that exist to protect them.

It is no secret that across Nigeria’s thirty-six (36) States, most State Assemblies are considered mere extensions of the Executive. They lack independence, autonomy, and courage. Lagos State, however, stands tall as a remarkable exception, a Legislature with what can rightly be called “the uncommon standard.”

Are Lagosians not proud that their Legislature is not a puppet of the Executive?

Would citizens prefer a rubber-stamp Assembly that shirks its constitutional duty simply to avoid headlines of supposed “political rifts”?

Or is the discomfort, in reality, with the Speaker himself, a leader who deeply understands legislative business and boldly asserts the powers given to the Legislature by the Constitution?

Dr. Mudashiru Obasa is not just another politician; he is an inimitable legislative phenomenon. Experience, after all, counts in politics. As the saying goes: “The older the wine, the sweeter it becomes.”

From his days as a Councillor in 1999, to becoming a Member of the Lagos State House of Assembly in 2003, and serving continuously since then, Obasa has built a reputation as one of Nigeria’s most enduring lawmakers. His leadership has seen him serve as Speaker for three consecutive terms, a feat few can match, while also held the position of Chairman, Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures in Nigeria.

Under his stewardship, the Lagos State House of Assembly has not only maintained its autonomy but has also risen to a global pedestal. Legislatures from other Nigerian States routinely come to Lagos to learn best practices. Parliaments from across Africa and beyond have sought collaboration, recognizing Lagos as a shining model of legislative independence.

This pedigree explains why Dr. Obasa is able to interpret legislative proceedings and exercise institutional powers with precision. It is not arrogance. It is experience, competence, and mastery of democratic governance.

To permanently address misinterpretations and enlighten citizens and journalists on democratic processes, I urge the Lagos State House of Assembly, under the leadership of Rt. Hon. (Dr.) Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa, to sponsor a bill establishing an Institute of Democratic Governance.

If Lagos becomes the first State in Nigeria to create such an institute, it will solidify its leadership in democratic innovation. The institute would serve as a training ground for public officers, journalists, civil society groups, and ordinary citizens. It would also deepen public understanding of separation of powers, legislative authority, and accountability.

Such an institute would be a lasting legacy, reducing sensationalism, enhancing civic education, and ensuring Lagosians appreciate the true workings of democracy.

The Lagos State House of Assembly has neither exceeded its powers nor acted contrary to law by insisting on legislative confirmation of political appointees. On the contrary, it has fulfilled its sacred mandate.

The Legislature is not an enemy of the Executive; it is a constitutional partner. The Speaker and members of the House deserve commendation for defending the rule of law, not condemnation through misleading headlines.

As citizens, we should applaud a Legislature that sets the standard for accountability across Nigeria. After all, a democracy where Legislatures are weak is a democracy perpetually at risk.

Rt. Hon. (Dr.) Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa stands today as a testament to legislative excellence, a leader who has placed Lagos on the global map of democratic governance. His legacy, like fine wine, only grows richer with time.

*Olayiwola Rasheed Emmanuel is an Engineer, Poet, Journalist, Broadcaster, PR Strategist, Prolific Writer, and Politician. He was the Former Special Adviser on Environment, Information, and Civic Engagement to the immediate past Chairman of Agege Local Government.

Continue Reading

GROpinion

HID Awolowo – Ten Years After, The Matriarch Who Defined a Generation

BY Sir Folu Olamiti FNGE

Published

on

HID Awolowo

Ten years after her passing, the name Hannah Idowu Dideolu Awolowo still evokes images of grace, grit, and quiet power.

Known affectionately as HID, she was more than the wife of Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the legendary nationalist and statesman.

She was a formidable figure in her own right, a trader-turned-industrialist, a strategist, a political bridge-builder, and the steady compass that kept one of Nigeria’s most consequential political movements from capsizing in stormy waters.

This is not merely a story of a dutiful wife, it is a story of a woman who used her own agency to help rewrite Nigeria’s history. She was a heroin

Born on November 25, 1915, in the quiet town of Ikenne-Remo, Ogun State, HID was the only surviving child of her parents, a pattern that traced back through generations and perhaps shaped the tenacity that defined her life.

Her early years were spent between classrooms and market stalls, learning arithmetic by day and shadowing her mother on trading trips by dusk.

These formative experiences did more than put food on the table, they equipped her with commercial savvy that would later fund political revolutions.

She met a young Obafemi Awolowo in the late 1930s in Ibadan. Their courtship carried out through carefully written love letters culminated in a modest wedding in 1937. From the very beginning, their partnership was built on shared ambition and mutual sacrifice.

She set aside her own career dreams to support his, embracing the role of homemaker and back-room strategist while he pursued law studies in London.

When Awolowo left for England in 1944, he entrusted HID with £20 for family upkeep. In an act that would later become family legend, she ignored his instruction not to trade and invested the entire sum in foodstuffs.

The profits not only sustained the family but also allowed her to send remittances to her husband, funds that kept him afloat as a struggling student.

Upon his return, HID expanded her trading ventures into full-fledged enterprises, Dideolu Stores, Ligu Distribution Services, and distributorships for tobacco and brewery products.

These businesses were far from ornamental, they were profit-spinning ventures that underwrote Awolowo’s political campaigns and financed the founding of The Nigerian Tribune in 1949.

By the 1960s, HID had become one of the most successful female industrialists of her time, combining sharp business instincts with frugal discipline.

HID’s real test came during Nigeria’s most turbulent political years. When Awolowo was jailed in 1962 on treason charges, HID became the unflinching face of the Awolowo political dynasty. She attended court sessions religiously, delivered meals to her husband in prison, managed the family businesses, and kept the Action Group’s political machinery running despite state harassment.

Her courage was not merely symbolic. She stood on podiums across the Western Region, broom in hand, rallying supporters to “sweep away the dirt” of misrule. In 1964, she even contested an election in her husband’s stead, demonstrating that her political credentials were not honorary but earned.

Tragedy deepened her burdens when their first son, Segun, one of his father’s legal defenders died in a car crash. Yet she refused to retreat into private grief.

Instead, she became even more committed to the causes she and her husband shared, education, social welfare, and good governance.

Those who encountered HID often spoke of her poise and faith. She was calm yet firm, deeply religious yet pragmatic, and fiercely loyal to her family. Awolowo famously attributed his success to three things, “the Grace of God, Spartan self-discipline, and a good wife.” That wife would go on to hold chieftaincy titles including Yeye Oba of Ile-Ife and the custom-created Yeye Oodua, a recognition of her status as mother figure to the Yoruba nation.

Even after Awolowo’s death in 1987, HID continued to chair the Nigerian Tribune and serve as the anchor of the Awolowo Foundation, ensuring that her husband’s legacy of progressive politics was preserved for future generations.

On September 19, 2015, HID passed away just weeks before her 100th birthday. Her burial in Ikenne drew presidents, governors, monarchs, and ordinary Nigerians who saw in her a symbol of integrity and resilience. The celebrations were not just of a life well-lived but of a life that continues to inspire.

Her legacy endures through the HID Awolowo Foundation, which promotes women’s empowerment and entrepreneurship, and through the generations of leaders she mentored and inspired, including her grandson-in-law, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo.

A decade later, HID Awolowo’s story remains strikingly relevant. At a time when many lament the shrinking space for principled leadership and women’s participation in public life, her example offers hope. She proved that one could be a wife, a mother, a business mogul, and a political force without compromising integrity.

Her life challenges today’s generation to embrace resilience over resignation, enterprise over dependency, and courage over complacency.

HID’s quiet power was not in loud rhetoric but in unwavering consistency, an attribute Nigeria’s political class could learn from.

Chief (Mrs.) HID Awolowo was more than a historical figure, she was a living institution. Her nearly 100 years on earth bridged pre-colonial, colonial, and post-independence Nigeria, making her a witness and participant in the making of the nation.

Ten years after her transition, she remains, in the words of Harvard scholar Prof. J.K. Olupona, “the archetypal mother who guided the collective lived experience of the Yoruba nation.”

Her story is not just about the past, it is a roadmap for the future for every Nigerian woman who dares to dream, for every leader who seeks to govern with vision, and for every citizen who longs for a nation built on courage, discipline, and faith.

Continue Reading

GROpinion

One Nigeria: How Governor Mbah is Leading the Azikiwe Dream

By Majeed Dahiru

Published

on

Peter Ndubuisi Mbah

A few weeks to his inauguration as governor of Enugu state on May 29 2023, I had my first meeting with Peter Mbah along with a few other colleague media personalities.

The meeting, which was at the instance of my good friend, brother and perhaps one of Nigeria’s best media relations guru, Uche Anichukwu, held at the Abuja Transcorp Hilton.

Present at the meeting was also my good friend Ifeanyi Ossai, then deputy governor-elect of Enugu state. For many years,

I have been deeply connected to the political leadership of Enugu state to the extent that the state has become my second ‘’state of origin’’. And in these years, I have come to appreciate a leadership value system that is firmly hinged on a deep connection between the political leaders and the people of Enugu state.

In my close interaction with leading lights of Enugu state such as former Governor Ifeanyi Uguwanyi, former Deputy Senate President Ike Ekwerenmadu, former house of representative members Patrick Asadu and Toby Okechukwu among many others, I have come to the realization that if there is one state in Nigeria where democracy is truly work in progress then it is my second home state.

But throughout my years of involvement in Enugu affairs, I never met Peter Mbah, who by then was busy carving a niche in the ecosystem of Nigeria’s organized private as a leading player in the oil and gas industry as the chairman of Pinnacle until the Abuja meeting.

At the meeting, Peter Ndubuisi Mbah, a lawyer, business man and politician who previously served as chief of staff in the administration of former governor Chimaroke Nnamani, in a very calm, composed and stoic mien, took us through his vision for the state.

In fact, he reiterated his campaign promises including the creation of a 30billion dollar economy, resuscitation of urban water supply, ending sit at home, upgrading of health facilities and most importantly the building of smart schools to usher Enugu children into a future that is today.

Listening keenly to this gentleman, I saw a serous minded man who means the business of governance.

Satisfied that Peter Mbah knew exactly what he wanted to do as governor, I decided to quip in a little suggestion on the need for him to run a government that should be inclusive of all Nigerians resident in the state irrespective of ethnicity and religion, especially given the fact that Enugu was the former regional capital of the old Eastern Region.

I specifically made this suggestion to the incoming governor, because of the widespread perception that the Igbo people of Nigeria are not accommodating of other groups as they are accommodated outside their eastern heartland home region and this issue is often weaponized against individual politicians seeking the highest office in the land from one of Nigeria’s most important sections.

As I made this appeal, Governor Peter Mbah, an otherwise straight-faced man with an expressionless mien, let out a smile of appreciation without saying a word. Little did I know that I was preaching Catholicism to the Bishop of Rome.

The recent controversy surrounding the abandonment of a multi-billion naira contract for the construction of Governor Mbah’s smart schools across the state, which was awarded to Olasijibomi Ogundele, a Lagos based Yoruba property developer has clearly revealed Peter Mbah as a detribalized pan Nigerian nationalist who is leading and living out the vision of the Great Zik of Africa of one united Nigerian nation of citizens away from a fractured country of disunited tribesmen.

After all it all began in 1952, when Nnamdi Azikiwe’s NCNC party threw up Mallam Umaru Altine, a Hausa speaking Muslim from northern Nigeria, who was resident in Enugu city as the Mayor of the regional capital of the Nigeria’s Igbo homeland; a feat in national integration that has remained a reference point in national unity for more than half a century.

This commentary is not about the business dispute between Brethren Olasijibomi Ogundele and Enugu state government but more about the fact that Governor Peter Mbah has shattered the myth or if you like the fallacy and falsehood about Ndigbo not being accommodating of others as they want others to accommodate them.

By entrusting some of his most important project in the hands of ‘’others’’ Governor Mbah’s action has clearly vindicated the Igbo people of Nigeria and rebranded their image as a people who truly believe in the philosophy of ‘’Nwanne di na Mbah’’ [a brethren can be found in foreign land].

Interestingly, Olasijibomi Ogundele is not the first and only beneficiary of Enugu state government patronage within the context of this commentary.

Recently, the Governor commissioned five ultra-modern bus terminals in Enugu state as part of his administration’s transportation master plan to provide affordable and seamless interconnectivity across the state’s major towns and city centre. Four of those terminals were constructed by Planets Projects; a Lagos based construction whose major promoter is Eng Biodun Otunola.

The modern Oshodi Bus terminal in Lagos was constructed by this firm. Similarly, the multi-billion naira Enugu state Command and Control Centre, which is reported to be the biggest in Nigeria with AI-enabled surveillance cameras across the state vide fibre optic cables, was built by Hajaraisan Nig LTD.

The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the company is Aminu Uba Miko, an indigene of Kano state, while Ibrahim Shehu from Jigawa state was engaged to develop the Enugu State Vehicles’ Identification System Software.

And XEJET, the operator of the recently launched Enugu Enugu Air; an Enugu state owned airline was founded by Emmanuel Izah from Kogi state.

The good thing about these engagements is that they were competitively bided for but the Yoruba or Hausa ethnicities of Enugu state government’s preferred bidders did not limit or diminish their chances of winning the contract in Peter Mbah’s Enugu.

Just as Planets Project has a track record in transport infrastructure construction and management, so does Olasijibomi’s Sujimoto Property construction firm have a solid track record as pioneers of smart buildings in Africa.

That the Enugu state government has taking steps to sanction Olasijibomi Ogundele clearly shows that Governor Mbah has no incestuous relationship with the young man and that his engagement was purely based on the belief that he can deliver on the job.

Away from these few cases amongst many others, Governor Mbah in making strategic appointments in Enugu state has demonstrated the oneness of Nigeria, where the principles of inclusion, equity and justice reigns supreme.

The Managing Director of Enugu state Broadcasting Service is Ladi Akeredolu-Ale, a veteran broadcaster from Ondo state, while the man helping Governor Peter Mbah to drive his vision for available, accessible and affordable healthcare is Dr Yomi Jaye, his Special Adviser on Health Matters.

To boost the IGR of the state, Governor Mbah hired Adenike Okebu as his Senior Special Assistant on Revenue. While Alh Abubakar Yusuf Sambo serves as the governor’s Senior Special Assistant on Special Duties, the Commander of Enugu Forest Guard is Olamitisoji Akinbamilayo, a retired Deputy Commissioner of Police who served in the Enugu state Command.

The retired DCP was in charge of operations when Governor Mbah directed the full implementation of the ban on sit-at-home and other violent activities by miscreants. For his meritorious service to the state, DCP Akinbamilayo was retained by the state as part of its security management team.

Peter Mbah’s Enugu state is the Nigeria of our dreams. And when the Igbo people of Nigeria are accused wrongly, they should point in the direction of Peter Mbah’s Enugu State.

Like I have consistently maintained, Nigerians are essentially one people and the various ethnic groupings are simply members of the same family that are living in different parts of the family compound.

A movement from one part of the family compound to another should not render a member of the family an outsider inside his/her family compound.

This is called citizenship. And as citizens of Nigeria, we should be free to reside in any part of the federation without the dichotomy of ‘’indigene and settler’’ wherein one’s ethnicity can enhance or diminish access to state provision and protection.

The fundamental condition preceding national development and security of any sovereign entity is the social cohesion, national integration and unity of the constituent peoples. Now we know why Peter Mbah’s Enugu State is working progressively.

*Dahiru is an Abuja-based public affairs analyst

Continue Reading

Trending