GROpinion
Disrupting the Nigerian cattle business
Cattle is causing such pain in Nigeria these days. So much death and destruction has gone into producing the beef we all consume to our delight in most of our meals. And the tension in the country is increasing as a result.
The simple process of breeding cattle is leading to ethnic and religious tension that’s capable of upsetting the delicate peace Nigeria has maintained for a while. While this problem is not limited to Nigeria, ours is peculiar because there does not seem to be any will or willingness to find a solution that could liberate the cattle business, a multibillion dollar business that is critical to our economy.
Worldwide, beef is one of the biggest agricultural products, but its rearing has such profound effect on the environment that it’s easy to see how it causes such problems between those who breed and the places they do so.
But everyone is united in the knowledge that beef, the meat produced from cattle is the king of our palate. In the west and most of the developed world, steak and its variants are the king of meals.
In Nigeria, from suya to steak and other things in-between, beef separates the have and the have nots. Beyond basic consumption, cattle has gone on to create its own place in our culture.
In the East of Nigeria for example, the totality of your life when you die is summed up in the number of live cows that are used and donated for your burial. Same for weddings and other ceremonies. And this is not limited to the East. The rest of Nigeria have a favorite place for the cow and the beef that comes from it.
The churches have latched on too. Church Harvests in most Christian churches today is denominated in how many ropes(cows) that church members and groups donate. In different churches, these ropes have different price tags depending on how affluent the church is. So, while a rope in my rural village or somewhere in the slums of Lagos could be N100 thousand naira, in the more affluent Abuja and parts of Lagos, the same rope or cow could be twice or much higher as members outdo themselves to display their affluence in the house of God.
So, lets accept it, the cow is a major part of our daily life. Both for its meat and its influence in our culture and religion. I laugh at those who talk about boycotting beef. That’s a joke. People will keep eating beef until we produce steak in the lab and replace the cattle. This is going to happen but it’s just a little way off. When we get there, a lab in Lagos or Enugu will produce all the cow meat we need.
The Fulani in Nigeria have been the traditional keepers of cattle in Nigeria for generations. They have followed the tradition of old of open grazing to rear their cattle. As deforestation and desert encroachment and urbanization have changed the dynamics of this business, they have found themselves migrating down south for grazing areas for their cattle. In the process they have come into conflict with other farmers and other tribes. Cattle destroys what it feeds on. If I grow cassava and your cattle comes into my farm, the cattle eat up my cassava. There will no way I will be happy.
Sadly, as Nigerian population keeps growing and more beef is needed to feed all of us and more grazing land is required, this problem of cattle and farm owners will keep increasing. It has turned deadly in the past decade with cattle breeders moving more and more southward and arming themselves to protect their valuable assets. They have attacked communities that resisted them. And there has been death. The body count has been increasing by the day.
Government has appeared helpless or at times seems to be complicit. There have been insinuations that the Fulani, entrenched in the Nigeria government and security services are providing protection to cattle breeders. It does not help when our current president, a cattle breeder himself and a patron of the cattle breeder association gets accused of abetting and supporting by his silence and inaction. This is sad. Most government appointees including the minister of agriculture who could use his office to find a solution are playing games. Perhaps in fear of offending the president.
Their suggestion of decreeing land for cattle breeders is at best silly. Cattle rearing is a big and profitable business. That can pay for itself. If we do the numbers, the beef opportunity in Nigeria is a multibillion dollar business. And as the Nigerian population keeps growing and gets more affluent, this business will continue to grow. Those who are involved know this. And are ready to kill for it. And lobby those in power to protect their heinous business practice instead of looking at modernizing the business.
Why would the solution be to take peoples farmland and hand over to cattle breeders who make profit from their business? Cattle rearing has evolved over centuries and today, the method used in Nigeria is outdated and not sustainable. But this business is a big business that the country cannot ignore. So, it’s in everyone’s interest that it is made sustainable and not driven by one group trying to subdue the other.
I suggest that we look at the cattle business opportunity and see its modernization as an opportunity open to all Nigerians. I do not understand why it must be Fulani people imported from Niger republic that must keep cattle in Benue or Enugu or Ekiti. It is also not cast in stone that you must be Fulani to breed cattle. And if Enugu or Benue are good for cattle grazing, why are business people from those areas not taking the opportunity to open cattle farms using more modern techniques.?
If you are a younger Fulani businessman, are you not embarrassed that this business opportunity handed down by your forefathers is still left in the stone age while you aspire to be the cattle breeders of the future. Do you want to hide behind government to take over people’s farmlands when you are in a business that can pay its way?
Governments role here should be to provide incentives to those who want to modernize their practice. And for new entrants into the business using modern techniques that have been in use in other parts of the world. Instead of trying to decree easy passage for some at the pain of others who also have a livelihood to maintain. Cattle breeding should not be about blood and sorrow and a source of political and social tension.
The Nigerian leadership should be embarrassed at its poor handling of this business of cattle breeding. Why do we put politics above business and sustainable livelihood? We have messed up the oil opportunity and turned the Niger Delta into a theatre of war and waste. The manufacturing opportunity has been lost turning once manufacturing plants and warehouses into churches. Government has mismanaged the opportunity for education and turned our educational system into a system that produces mostly unemployable graduates. The list goes on and on. Our predatory leadership has shown little capacity for creating economic opportunities for Nigerians to live a better and more fulfilling life. It will be sad if we let the opportunity for cattle breeding become a blood sport because our government is just incapable or is partial at taking the firm and correct decisions that can open the business up to serious players who can clearly see the huge opportunities the business offers.
Written by Collins Onuegbu
GROpinion
Insecurity In Zamfara – Hold Lawal Accountable, Not Matawalle
Writes Nasiru Aliyu, Media Advisor to the Hon. Minister
The recent protest organized by the All Progressives Congress (APC) Akida Forum raises significant questions about political motivations and accountability.
Led by Musa Mahmoud the APC AKIDA group staged a demonstration at the Abuja headquarters of the Department of State Services (DSS), demanding an investigation into the Minister of State for Defence, Dr. Bello Mohammed Matawalle, amid allegations linking him to banditry in the state.
The protest, predominantly featuring hired women and youths from Abuja, was framed as a response to escalating security concerns in Zamfara.
However, the underlying motives appear to be rooted in political rivalry rather than genuine concern for public safety.
The leader of the APC Akida Forum Tijjani Ramallan claims that Governor Dauda Lawal has accused Matawalle of collusion with bandits, suggesting that such ties have perpetuated the insecurity plaguing the region.
A critical point overlooked by Mahmoud and his supporters is that Matawalle is no longer the executive governor of Zamfara.
The current governor, Dauda Lawal, now holds the title of the state’s chief security officer, and therefore, he bears the primary responsibility for addressing the security crisis.
Instead of engaging in a blame game, Lawal should focus on implementing effective strategies to combat the rampant insecurity and provide the dividends of democracy to the people of Zamfara state.
The animosity towards Matawalle seems to stem from his previous role as the Director General of Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s campaign in the Northwest, where he played a pivotal role in securing significant electoral support for the current president.
This success has reportedly fueled envy among some political figures like Tijjani Ramallan, including Musa Mahmoud and others who may feel threatened by Matawalle’s rising profile.
It is noteworthy that allegations against Matawalle have been investigated by the National Security Adviser’s office, which found no evidence to support claims of his involvement in banditry.
This investigation contributed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to retain Matawalle in his ministerial position, where he has reportedly managed security matters in the Northwest with professionalism.
Adding to the complexity of this situation, a Kano High Court recently issued a restraining order against Governor Lawal and others, prohibiting them from continuing their smear campaign against Matawalle. This legal development underscores the court’s recognition of the potential harm caused by unfounded allegations and the need for accountability in political discourse and the state government has found an ally in APC AKIDA led by Tijjani Ramallan.
Despite the court’s intervention, Governor Lawal continues to leverage media platforms to tarnish Matawalle’s reputation, linking him to banditry and corruption without substantiating evidence.
Such tactics appear to be desperate attempts to undermine Matawalle’s credibility, likely motivated by Lawal’s desire to solidify his political standing.
The ongoing campaign against Matawalle by Lawal and his associates raises serious concerns about the integrity of political discourse in Zamfara.
It is imperative for the public to remain vigilant against misleading narratives and to recognize the broader implications of such political maneuvers.
The Kano High Court’s ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and the need for responsible governance.
In conclusion, the focus of accountability in Zamfara should shift towards Governor Dauda Lawal, who now holds the reins of security in the state.
Instead of casting blame on former officials, Lawal must take ownership of the security situation and work towards tangible solutions that prioritize the safety and well-being of the people of Zamfara.
Furthermore, since Matawalle operational visit to sokoto led to the elimination of Bandit leader Halilu Sububu who is alleged to have died with the treasure of the sponsors of banditry in zamfara state, the pain propelled them to further embark on campaign of calumny.
The recent activities of some individuals with one Davids Iyida attempting to sabotage the MoMo Payment Service Bank project intended to benefit, especially Enugu Ezike people, have raised significant concern and outrage within the community.
Such actions aimed at undermining a project with immense potential to uplift and empower the people of Enugu Ezike can only be described as malicious.
The MoMo PSB project is designed to bring financial services closer to the people of Enugu Ezike, facilitating easier access to banking and financial transactions.
This project is expected to create jobs, stimulate local businesses, and provide a much-needed boost to the local economy. In a region where such opportunities are rare, the MoMo PSB project represents a beacon of hope for many residents.
It is particularly baffling and disheartening to witness a member of the community collaborate with outsiders to hinder the progress of their own people.
The reasons behind such alliances remain unclear, but the impact of these actions is evident and deeply troubling. Working to obstruct the project is not only delaying progress but also actively working against the welfare and advancement of Enugu Ezike.
The efforts to destroy Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu’s good intention, despite all the positive contributions he has made, are nothing short of wickedness.
Adonu, a visionary entrepreneur and the leading MTN Partner in the South East, has dedicated significant resources and efforts to bring the MoMo Payment Service Bank project to fruition.
His vision for the community includes economic growth, financial inclusion, and overall development. Attacking his vision is an attack on the progress and future of Enugu Ezike.
The question that lingers in the minds of many is: Why sabotaging our own benefits? In a time when unity and collective effort are paramount for the community’s advancement, such actions of sabotage are counterproductive and harmful. The community needs all hands on deck to drive development and improve the quality of life for its residents. Internal conflicts and malicious actions only serve to set back these efforts.
Despite the challenges and the malicious attempts to derail the project, it is important to reaffirm that S Mobile Group vision for establishing a MoMo Payment Service Bank in Enugu Ezike will prevail.
The community stands behind this vision, recognizing the immense benefits it promises to bring. Efforts to hinder progress will ultimately fail in the face of collective determination and support.
The actions of these ungrateful individuals, aimed at sabotaging the MoMo PSB project, are grave disservice to the community of Enugu Ezike.
In a time when progress and development are desperately needed, such malicious activities are deeply regrettable.
However, the vision and determination of Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu and the community’s support ensure that the project will succeed, bringing much-needed growth and prosperity to Enugu Ezike.
Let it be known that no amount of sabotage can dim the light of progress and unity.
Nwodo, a public commentator writes from Enugu State
Columnists
Cybersecurity in 2024: Towards Ever Greater Sophistication of Tactics
Writer: CHESTER WISNIEWSKI, Director Global Field CTO, Sophos
With 2024 fast approaching, what are the results for 2023 and what are the developments in the threat landscape for this new year?
The year 2023 was marked by persistence in the tactics of cybercriminals, with the predominance of ransomware, the exploitation of vulnerabilities, theft of credentials and even attacks targeting the supply chain. The common point in all his attacks is their formidable effectiveness.
It is therefore essential to ask what trends will persist in 2024 and what strategies businesses should adopt to deal with these future cyber threats.
Between persistent trends and evolving cybercrime tactics
In 2024, the threat landscape is not expected to change radically, particularly with regard to attack typologies and criminal tactics and procedures.
Criminal groups still primarily focus their attention on financial gains and ransomware remains their weapon of choice. These cybercriminals tend to take the easy way out by opportunistically attacking unpatched security vulnerabilities.
The recent Citrix Bleed attack demonstrated the agility of cybercriminals when it comes to quickly and effectively exploiting these new vulnerabilities.
However, once patches are applied to these vulnerabilities, cyberattackers tend to revert to more common strategies of stealing credentials or, failing that, cookies or session cookies, which, while slightly slower, constitute always a proven means that allows them to penetrate within a system.
In 2024, however, we should expect increased sophistication in defense evasion tactics, particularly due to the generalization of certain technologies such as multi-factor authentication. These attacks will combine malicious proxy servers, social engineering techniques and repeated authentication request attacks or “fatigue attacks”.
AI and regulations will continue to shape cybersecurity
In 2024, the development of AI will have a positive impact on the efficiency of IT teams and security teams by enabling them to strengthen defenses and work more efficiently, including through the processing of vast volumes of data in the aim of detecting anomalies. It should make it possible to respond more quickly in the event of an incident.
Indeed, analysis of attacks in 2023 showed a shortening of the time between network penetration and the triggering of a final attack – using malware or ransomware. The need for rapid detection and response tools to prevent costly incidents is therefore essential.
Finally, regulatory developments could have a major influence on measures taken against ransomware. The need to take more substantial measures could push some states to penalize the payment of ransoms, which would represent a brake on malicious actors and change the perspective of companies in the event of an attack.
Other stricter legislation, such as the implementation of the European NIS2 Directive, is also expected to force companies to take additional measures, particularly regarding their abilities to collect data sets.
To protect themselves against increasingly rapid, effective and costly attacks, companies will need to strengthen their defenses by equipping themselves with tools that allow them to detect and respond to incidents more quickly.
The worsening cybersecurity talent shortage does not appear to be as serious as some studies claim. On the contrary, companies have implemented more lax hiring criteria and more open-mindedness in the recruitment process.
From this perspective, to guarantee their survival in a constantly evolving threat landscape, companies have every interest in establishing partnerships with cybersecurity experts whose main mission is to make the hyperconnected world safer, to advise and assist them. in setting up effective defenses.