GROpinion
What Is Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s Strategic Roadmap To Restoring Biafra?
By Justice Godfrey Okamgba
Preamble
The ambitious move by the Igbos to break away from NIGERIA and become a sovereign nation started many years ago. On this day 30th May 1967, (53 years ago) the Igbos declared their independence from Nigeria. After diplomatic efforts by Nigeria to reunite the country failed, the war between Nigeria and Biafra broke out in July 1967.
The de facto independent REPUBLIC OF BIAFRA ultimately surrendered after an estimated 3 million people were reported to have been dead. It was a colossal loss to the Igbos. Life became extremely tough, many people became homeless. Today will forever remain a remarkable day in the history of the Igbos and Nigerian at large.
The Journey Before Kanu’s Exile
Like Bob Marley said, “don’t forget your history, and remember your destiny.” This is the time to reflect on the journey so far. The agitation for Biafra still continues, irrespective of the unquantifiable damages it has cost the Igbos.
Quite simply, the momentum the agitation has gathered in recently is commendable and exhilarating. In all of these seemingly positive vibes, there is one person that stands out. That person is Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).
He took over from Ralph Uwazuruike, a man who was reported to have betrayed the trust and compromise the struggle for personal gains. From several indications thus far, Kanu has proven to be resilient, stiff-necked, and determined to actualize the sovereign state of Biafra.
The supposedly Prince of Afaraukwu Kingdom, in Umuahia, Abia State, could not attend the burial ceremony of his parents who were buried the same day. That is one of the prices he has paid fighting for freedom.
Prior to his exile, Kanu was arrested on treason and terrorism charges in Lagos, on 14 October 2015. The British citizen was detained for more than a year, despite various court orders that ruled for his release.
His innate guts, fearlessness, and confidence send chills down the spine of an average Nigerian. Even while in detention he roared like a lion, calling President Buhari a mad man. ”Tell Buhari he is a mad man, he cannot jail me.” A rare breed, I must say.
After a series of trials, Justice Binta Nyako eventually granted bail to Kanu on health grounds with 12 stringent conditions. One such condition is that the IPOB leader shouldn’t be found in a group of more than 10 people; grant interviews or even hold rallies. Without any iota of stupefaction, Kanu flouted many of his bail conditions with so much impunity.
He toured Umuahia, Abia State Capital with his IPOB members. In fact, there are recorded clips showing how Kanu and his group had clashed with Nigerian security operatives. This period, Umuahia gradually turned out to be a military zone.
Nnamdi Kanu’s Mysterious Escape From Nigeria
On the 12th of September 2017, the Nigerian soldiers laid siege to Afaraukwu, the country home of Kanu. The heavily armed men clashed with members of IPOB leading to the death of 15 persons, according to Guardian Nigeria.
There are videos made available on social media revealing how Nigerian Military shot sporadically in Afaraukwu. With the aid of his relatives, Kanu managed to escape the bloody tragedy that could have possibly took his life.
Several months passed by until the IPOB leader confirmed that he was smuggled out of Nigeria to Israel, the country, he described as the safest place at that time. Finally, Kanu settled in the UK where he currently does his live broadcast.
IPOB Leader’s Focus Since Exile
Kanu’s focus has been unraveling and disemboweling Nigeria with largely indisputable facts and evidence. Beyond every doubt, the IPOB leader has been a credible source of information to certain clandestine activities in NIGERIA. His researching prowess is mind-blowing. How he does it is somewhat befuddling.
His live broadcasts and social media posts have become an eye-opener; an educative and enlightenment dose for gullible Nigerians. Irrespective of all these invaluable insights from Kanu, where are we in the struggle for Biafra?
Kanu has continually and repeatedly talked about the death of Buhari. He had asserted without mincing words that Nigeria had Jubril, an impostor from Sudan as Nigeria’s President before he died in Cuba.
Again, he claims that the current person acting as Nigeria’s President is Aisha Buhari’s lover who has been using a hypersensitive facial mask. He talks about Nigeria’s missing Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo; deceptive photoshopped pictures released by Femi Adesina; Fulanis invading the Igbo land, and many other allied matters in Nigeria.
One particular thing is missing – his strategic roadmap to restoring Biafra. What is Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s game plan? Who are the most significant stakeholders in this course that he has engaged? What is the timeline for restoring Biafra?
What about the lawmakers – have they discussed this in the Nigerian Parliament? What is the position of Igbo leaders on this matter? These and many more questions are yet to be answered.
What Is Nnamdi Kanu’s Relationship With Igbo Leaders?
Kanu’s engagement with external bodies all over the world is well pronounced. But how fruitful would that be without engaging Igbo leaders? My proposal to Kanu is this, only the Igbos can give themselves Biafra. United Nations would not, Donald J. Trump would not, Boris Johnson would not. They will ask questions before any help can come from them.
IPOB leader on many occasions reprimands certain Igbo leaders who are obviously not interested inthe freedom fight. The restoration can only be actualized when Igbo leaders are ready to be in sync and pursue that course collectively.
Imagine, all the Igbo lawmakers both Upper and Lower Chamber, Ministers, Governors, Diplomats, Director Generals of all government parastatals converging to agitate for Biafra. Again, imagine them holding a peaceful discourse with other top Nigerian leaders.
Let’s even assume that President Buhari and other Northern Leaders decided to be unyielding, then Igbos can seek external support. This task could be achieved without even carrying arms.
It doesn’t matter what the 1999 Constitution stipulates. Nigerian leaders would unquestionably bow to pressure and forfeit the unscrupulous chant for ”One Nigeria”.
Historical facts and evidence have proven that Igbos have nothing in common with the Northerners. The biggest error was to have amalgamated these two different nations together in 1914.
Why Biafra Agitation May Further Prove Futile
Are you aware that IPOB was proscribed as a terrorist group? The biggest challenge to actualizing the BIAFRA SOVEREIGN STATE would be selfish aggrandizement. The Igbo elites who are supposed to spearhead this agenda have divergent interests.
Some have compromised in a bid for a political appointment. Some are gripped with the fear that the restoration of Biafra would mean losing their properties and investments outside the Igbo region. Some are interested in becoming the first Igbo President in 2023.
With all this variety of interests, it seems a herculean task to have all Igbo elites agree to this common goal. The least they could have done was to stop the NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT from declaring an unarmed group of people a terrorist group.
When the Nigerian military launched their Python Dance in Abia State, there was nothing exemplary from the Igbo leaders to stop that mess. It was all press releases from right, left, and center. Press releases do not solve anything. The bitter truth is that the Igbo aristocrats care less about the restoration of Biafra. Clearly, it has been the lower middle class and the poor that have been fighting this fight of freedom.
Conclusion
Don’t let MAZI NNAMDI KANU’s relentlessness and vocals becloud your logic. The dude has suffered in this struggle to get the Igbos liberated from the so-called “One Nigerian”.
The reality is that Kanu will get tired and frustrated if the current style doesn’t change. I don’t see Biafra restoration a feasible project if the IGBO LEADERS are not at the fulcrum of the course. It’s practically impossible.
GROpinion
Insecurity In Zamfara – Hold Lawal Accountable, Not Matawalle
Writes Nasiru Aliyu, Media Advisor to the Hon. Minister
The recent protest organized by the All Progressives Congress (APC) Akida Forum raises significant questions about political motivations and accountability.
Led by Musa Mahmoud the APC AKIDA group staged a demonstration at the Abuja headquarters of the Department of State Services (DSS), demanding an investigation into the Minister of State for Defence, Dr. Bello Mohammed Matawalle, amid allegations linking him to banditry in the state.
The protest, predominantly featuring hired women and youths from Abuja, was framed as a response to escalating security concerns in Zamfara.
However, the underlying motives appear to be rooted in political rivalry rather than genuine concern for public safety.
The leader of the APC Akida Forum Tijjani Ramallan claims that Governor Dauda Lawal has accused Matawalle of collusion with bandits, suggesting that such ties have perpetuated the insecurity plaguing the region.
A critical point overlooked by Mahmoud and his supporters is that Matawalle is no longer the executive governor of Zamfara.
The current governor, Dauda Lawal, now holds the title of the state’s chief security officer, and therefore, he bears the primary responsibility for addressing the security crisis.
Instead of engaging in a blame game, Lawal should focus on implementing effective strategies to combat the rampant insecurity and provide the dividends of democracy to the people of Zamfara state.
The animosity towards Matawalle seems to stem from his previous role as the Director General of Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s campaign in the Northwest, where he played a pivotal role in securing significant electoral support for the current president.
This success has reportedly fueled envy among some political figures like Tijjani Ramallan, including Musa Mahmoud and others who may feel threatened by Matawalle’s rising profile.
It is noteworthy that allegations against Matawalle have been investigated by the National Security Adviser’s office, which found no evidence to support claims of his involvement in banditry.
This investigation contributed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to retain Matawalle in his ministerial position, where he has reportedly managed security matters in the Northwest with professionalism.
Adding to the complexity of this situation, a Kano High Court recently issued a restraining order against Governor Lawal and others, prohibiting them from continuing their smear campaign against Matawalle. This legal development underscores the court’s recognition of the potential harm caused by unfounded allegations and the need for accountability in political discourse and the state government has found an ally in APC AKIDA led by Tijjani Ramallan.
Despite the court’s intervention, Governor Lawal continues to leverage media platforms to tarnish Matawalle’s reputation, linking him to banditry and corruption without substantiating evidence.
Such tactics appear to be desperate attempts to undermine Matawalle’s credibility, likely motivated by Lawal’s desire to solidify his political standing.
The ongoing campaign against Matawalle by Lawal and his associates raises serious concerns about the integrity of political discourse in Zamfara.
It is imperative for the public to remain vigilant against misleading narratives and to recognize the broader implications of such political maneuvers.
The Kano High Court’s ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and the need for responsible governance.
In conclusion, the focus of accountability in Zamfara should shift towards Governor Dauda Lawal, who now holds the reins of security in the state.
Instead of casting blame on former officials, Lawal must take ownership of the security situation and work towards tangible solutions that prioritize the safety and well-being of the people of Zamfara.
Furthermore, since Matawalle operational visit to sokoto led to the elimination of Bandit leader Halilu Sububu who is alleged to have died with the treasure of the sponsors of banditry in zamfara state, the pain propelled them to further embark on campaign of calumny.
The recent activities of some individuals with one Davids Iyida attempting to sabotage the MoMo Payment Service Bank project intended to benefit, especially Enugu Ezike people, have raised significant concern and outrage within the community.
Such actions aimed at undermining a project with immense potential to uplift and empower the people of Enugu Ezike can only be described as malicious.
The MoMo PSB project is designed to bring financial services closer to the people of Enugu Ezike, facilitating easier access to banking and financial transactions.
This project is expected to create jobs, stimulate local businesses, and provide a much-needed boost to the local economy. In a region where such opportunities are rare, the MoMo PSB project represents a beacon of hope for many residents.
It is particularly baffling and disheartening to witness a member of the community collaborate with outsiders to hinder the progress of their own people.
The reasons behind such alliances remain unclear, but the impact of these actions is evident and deeply troubling. Working to obstruct the project is not only delaying progress but also actively working against the welfare and advancement of Enugu Ezike.
The efforts to destroy Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu’s good intention, despite all the positive contributions he has made, are nothing short of wickedness.
Adonu, a visionary entrepreneur and the leading MTN Partner in the South East, has dedicated significant resources and efforts to bring the MoMo Payment Service Bank project to fruition.
His vision for the community includes economic growth, financial inclusion, and overall development. Attacking his vision is an attack on the progress and future of Enugu Ezike.
The question that lingers in the minds of many is: Why sabotaging our own benefits? In a time when unity and collective effort are paramount for the community’s advancement, such actions of sabotage are counterproductive and harmful. The community needs all hands on deck to drive development and improve the quality of life for its residents. Internal conflicts and malicious actions only serve to set back these efforts.
Despite the challenges and the malicious attempts to derail the project, it is important to reaffirm that S Mobile Group vision for establishing a MoMo Payment Service Bank in Enugu Ezike will prevail.
The community stands behind this vision, recognizing the immense benefits it promises to bring. Efforts to hinder progress will ultimately fail in the face of collective determination and support.
The actions of these ungrateful individuals, aimed at sabotaging the MoMo PSB project, are grave disservice to the community of Enugu Ezike.
In a time when progress and development are desperately needed, such malicious activities are deeply regrettable.
However, the vision and determination of Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu and the community’s support ensure that the project will succeed, bringing much-needed growth and prosperity to Enugu Ezike.
Let it be known that no amount of sabotage can dim the light of progress and unity.
Nwodo, a public commentator writes from Enugu State
Columnists
Cybersecurity in 2024: Towards Ever Greater Sophistication of Tactics
Writer: CHESTER WISNIEWSKI, Director Global Field CTO, Sophos
With 2024 fast approaching, what are the results for 2023 and what are the developments in the threat landscape for this new year?
The year 2023 was marked by persistence in the tactics of cybercriminals, with the predominance of ransomware, the exploitation of vulnerabilities, theft of credentials and even attacks targeting the supply chain. The common point in all his attacks is their formidable effectiveness.
It is therefore essential to ask what trends will persist in 2024 and what strategies businesses should adopt to deal with these future cyber threats.
Between persistent trends and evolving cybercrime tactics
In 2024, the threat landscape is not expected to change radically, particularly with regard to attack typologies and criminal tactics and procedures.
Criminal groups still primarily focus their attention on financial gains and ransomware remains their weapon of choice. These cybercriminals tend to take the easy way out by opportunistically attacking unpatched security vulnerabilities.
The recent Citrix Bleed attack demonstrated the agility of cybercriminals when it comes to quickly and effectively exploiting these new vulnerabilities.
However, once patches are applied to these vulnerabilities, cyberattackers tend to revert to more common strategies of stealing credentials or, failing that, cookies or session cookies, which, while slightly slower, constitute always a proven means that allows them to penetrate within a system.
In 2024, however, we should expect increased sophistication in defense evasion tactics, particularly due to the generalization of certain technologies such as multi-factor authentication. These attacks will combine malicious proxy servers, social engineering techniques and repeated authentication request attacks or “fatigue attacks”.
AI and regulations will continue to shape cybersecurity
In 2024, the development of AI will have a positive impact on the efficiency of IT teams and security teams by enabling them to strengthen defenses and work more efficiently, including through the processing of vast volumes of data in the aim of detecting anomalies. It should make it possible to respond more quickly in the event of an incident.
Indeed, analysis of attacks in 2023 showed a shortening of the time between network penetration and the triggering of a final attack – using malware or ransomware. The need for rapid detection and response tools to prevent costly incidents is therefore essential.
Finally, regulatory developments could have a major influence on measures taken against ransomware. The need to take more substantial measures could push some states to penalize the payment of ransoms, which would represent a brake on malicious actors and change the perspective of companies in the event of an attack.
Other stricter legislation, such as the implementation of the European NIS2 Directive, is also expected to force companies to take additional measures, particularly regarding their abilities to collect data sets.
To protect themselves against increasingly rapid, effective and costly attacks, companies will need to strengthen their defenses by equipping themselves with tools that allow them to detect and respond to incidents more quickly.
The worsening cybersecurity talent shortage does not appear to be as serious as some studies claim. On the contrary, companies have implemented more lax hiring criteria and more open-mindedness in the recruitment process.
From this perspective, to guarantee their survival in a constantly evolving threat landscape, companies have every interest in establishing partnerships with cybersecurity experts whose main mission is to make the hyperconnected world safer, to advise and assist them. in setting up effective defenses.
-
Spotlight5 days ago
Concerned citizens appeal to Gov Sanwo-Olu, Dangote Foundation, Banks, MTN Foundation, NNPC, others to assist journalist for brain surgery
-
Politics5 days ago
President Tinubu Restructures Media and Communications Team
-
Travel4 days ago
Defence Minister in S’Arabia to Discuss Counter-Terrorism
-
News2 days ago
Badaru on Operational Tour of 82 Division, other Military Installations in Enugu and Imo States
-
GRPolitics5 days ago
With Commitment, Resilience We’ll Defeat Banditry and Terrorism – Badaru
-
Energy3 days ago
Boost for Nigeria’s Oil Production, As NNPC’s Utapate Crude Grade Hits Global Oil Market
-
Events2 days ago
Speakers to Discuss How to Restore Nigerians’ Confidence in the Judiciary
-
Uncategorized7 hours ago
FG Pledges Enhanced Security for Southeast Region