News
Lazy Nigerian Journalists and the Principle of Sub Judice: Would Lai Mohammed Now Go to Jail?


A matter is said to be sub judice when a case is before a court or judge for determination. In other words, the matter is pending in a court, awaiting judgment.
The Honourable Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed has rightly confirmed that there may be no known law that bars anyone, including parties to a suit or third parties from making public statements on cases pending in Nigerian courts.
Therefore, the culture of press freedom in Nigeria from time immemorial allows citizens either as parties or journalists to freely make comments or write stories respectively on pending cases unless there are express orders of court, restricting such comments or stories based either on the application to court by any of the parties or by the judge suo moto ( on his own will). Such orders are popularly known as ‘gag orders’.
It is usual to see and hear lawyers, especially Senior Advocates of Nigeria addressing the press immediately after court sessions, where they make comments on cases where they had immediately appeared as counsel.
The misuse of the principle of sub judice by journalists
The misapplication of the principle of sub judice has been an excuse by lazy journalists who do not have the commitment to conduct research or investigation and write stories on particular matters that are in court. They simply cite such matters as being sub judice , just because they are pending in court. That lame excuse is also, most times, adopted by parties to a suit.
It should be noted that the law courts are where the real news reside. In fact, the socioeconomic development of a country can be largely determined in the courts. That accounts for the social engineering function of law. Only superficial media organisations would avoid the courts as a place to authentic gather news.
The Statement of the CJN
It became very worrisome when a statement was some time in January, 2018 credited to His Lordship, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), the Hon. Justice Walter Onnoghen wherein he was quoted that commentators on live, pending cases could go to jail. With greatest respect to the most reverred CJN, if he did authorise that statement, then, that position cannot be correct as it is against our known and established legal culture in Nigeria.
Of course, yes! Anyone who disobeys an order of a judge restricting public comments on a live case could most certainly go to jail on the
grounds of contempt of court.
If the statement credited to the CJN is to be taken seriously then Lai Mohammed should be prepared to face contempt proceedings and possibly be sent to jail for recently making controversial public statements on live criminal cases where the government that he legally represents is a party that is prosecuting Nigerians that are presumed to be innocent.
Would Lai Mohammed now go to jail?
Lai Mohammed recently held a press conference and published names of looters with attached amounts allegedly stolen by the persons he listed in spite of the fact that these said persons are currently facing trials in Nigerian courts on those same allegations. Nothing could be more flagrant and dismissive of the CJN’s warnings regarding making comments on live cases and risking going to jail.
Yet, Lai Mohammed is in order for there is no known order that bars him from publishing such a statement on looters. It is both an excercise of his constitutional duties under Section 24 and 148 and, his constitutional right under Section 39 , all contained in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as altered )
The most highly respected CJN should therefore exercise his enormous powers by making practice directions regarding public commentary on pending or live cases in order to add Nigeria to the number of few juridictions in the world which regulate comments on on-going cases by parties and third parties.
Let the Public Commentary Continue Where there is no Gag Order
Come to think of it? Nigeria, doesn’t need a regime of gag orders. Let everything, including pending cases be talked and written about freely. In a country where corruption largely operates as the public order why would for example, parties to cases of corruption prevent public statements to be made simply because they are involved in a pending case. That is an undemocratic culture. Let there be constact public discourses by everyone, even by parties to a suit provided they do nother dispar age the court. Why should a trained judge be swayed in his judgments by statements made in public regarding a case pending before him?
The crux of this writing is the angst flowing from a Nigerian press that has become incipient of listlessness, striving to be both politically and commercially correct at the expense of a journalistic duty contained in Section 22 of the Constitution of Nigeria which imposes the duty to uphold truth at all times and expose public and,nprivate corruption.
Journalists and media houses in Nigeria are now largely in short of courageous men and women who are committed to bold and factual journalism that transforms a people and country. Many of them are driven by bare necessities hence, they would clutch feverishly on the excuse that a matter is sub judice and therefore turn themselves to perpetual reporters of second hand news which has become the norm in this age of the Internet.
Journalist our only hope for now
The press, media houses have the greatest responsibility of sustaining democracy and hope for a better life in Nigerian. Owners and practitioners in the media must realise that it is self-preservatory for individuals and as a nation to boldly report news dispassionately.
The value of the looking glass concept which would make a people and a country correct itself and make improvements can only be served by a courageous press.
Frank Tietie
Lawyer and Executive Director of Citizens Advocacy for Social & Economic Rights ( CASER ), writes from Abuja.
News
Nigeria dismantles terror groups, Ansaru and Mahmuda, with the capture of their leaders
BY Sandra Ani


Nigeria has recorded a significant breakthrough in the war against terrorism with the capture of the leaders of Ansaru and Mahmuda.
At a press briefing on Saturday evening, the National Security Adviser, Malam Nuhu Ribadu, said the two terrorists on the wanted list of Nigeria, the US, UK and UN were captured in an operation which was conducted between May and July 2025.
He said the men were captured in a high-risk, intelligence-led, counter-terrorism operation which led to their capture. They are leaders of Jama’atu Ansarul Muslimina fi-Biladis Sudan, commonly known as ANSARU, Nigeria’s Al-Qaeda affiliate.
Ribadu said the two men have been responsible for masterminding many terrorist attacks against Nigeria over the past years.
According to Ribadu:
“The first is Mahmud Muhammad Usman (aka Abu Bara’a/Abbas/Mukhtar), the self-styled Emir of ANSARU. He is the coordinator of various terrorist sleeper cells across Nigeria. He is also the mastermind of several high-profile kidnappings and armed robberies used to finance terrorism over the years.
“The second is Mahmud al-Nigeri (aka Mallam Mamuda), Abu Bara’s proclaimed Chief of Staff and Deputy.
He is the leader of the so-called “Mahmudawa” cell hiding out in and around the Kainji National Park, straddling Niger and Kwara States up to Benin Republic. Mamuda trained in Libya between 2013 and 2015 under foreign jihadist instructors from Egypt, Tunisia, and Algeria, specialising in weapons handling and IED fabrication.
“These two men have been on Nigeria’s most-wanted list for years. They jointly spearheaded multiple attacks on civilians, security forces, and critical infrastructure. Their operations include the 2022 Kuje prison break, the attack on the Niger uranium facility, the 2013 abduction of French engineer Francis Collomp in Katsina, and the May 1, 2019 kidnapping of Alhaji Musa Umar Uba (Magajin Garin Daura). They were also behind the abduction of the Emir of Wawa and they maintain active links with terrorist groups across the Maghreb, particularly in Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso.
“The two men, who are wanted internationally, are currently in custody.
“The capture of Abu Bara and Mallam Mamuda, the group’s leader and deputy commander, respectively, marks one of the most significant achievements to date in our ongoing effort to rid Nigeria of the threat of terrorism. The successful decapitation of the leadership of this dangerous franchise marks the most decisive blow against ANSARU since its inception. This strike has effectively dismantled its central command while paving the path for the complete annihilation of the group”, Ribadu said.
The Ansaru group was first formed in January 2012 with a public declaration in Kano. It emerged as a splinter faction from Boko Haram, positioning itself as a “humane alternative.” However, its stated aim quickly turned to attacking Nigerian security operatives, civilian communities and government infrastructure. The group publicly displayed the setting sun logo of Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), signalling its ideological and operational alignment with global jihadist movements.
“Over the years, Ansaru entrenched itself in both urban sleeper cells and forest enclaves across several cities in northern Nigeria and in forest-based enclaves, particularly around Kainji National Park, straddling Niger and Kwara States, as well as the Benin Republic”, Ribadu explained.
News
France Urged to Address Colonial Legacy as Senegalese Activists Call for Reparations in Dakar Roundtable
Reporter: Sandra Ani


France’s colonial legacy came under renewed scrutiny as journalists, historians, and pan-African activists gathered at African Memorial Square in Dakar for a powerful roundtable advocating reparations and economic justice.
The event highlighted growing demands for France to take full responsibility for its historical role in Senegal and across West Africa.


Organized by advocacy groups including the Association of Descendants of Senegalese Soldiers, the Front for the Withdrawal of French Military Bases (GASSI), and JIF’AFRIK, the roundtable brought together influential voices pushing for reparatory justice and structural transformation.
Among the key speakers were Babacar Dioh of the Thiaroye 44 Movement—a coalition of descendants of Senegalese tirailleurs—and Souleymane Jules Diallo, leader of JIF’AFRIK. Discussions centered on two central demands: official reparations for colonial-era injustices and the urgent renegotiation of trade and military agreements that activists say perpetuate economic dependence.
“The time for symbolic gestures is over,” said Dioh. “We are now filing an official reparations claim and taking concrete steps to hold France accountable.”
Speakers called for the dismantling of existing neocolonial frameworks, stressing the ecological, financial, and social harm that has endured beyond the colonial period. The roundtable marks a turning point in Dakar’s positioning as a hub for coordinated African-led advocacy aimed at restoring historical justice.
This event adds momentum to a growing continental movement seeking tangible reparative action from former colonial powers and reinforces the call for equity, autonomy, and acknowledgment of historical truths.
News
Gov Mbah Inaugurates Committee to End Gender-Based Violence in Enugu


The Enugu State government has inaugurated a steering committee to eliminate Gender-Based Violence, GBV, in the state, declaring zero tolerance for the social malaise.
The inauguration took place at the Government House Enugu.
The panel, which is chaired by the Commissioner for Children, Gender Affairs and Social Development, Mrs. Ngozi Enih, draws its membership from the Nigeria Police Force, Ministry of Agriculture and Agro Industrialisation, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Chieftaincy Affairs, Ministry of Human Development and Poverty Reduction, Ministry of Trade, Investment and Industry, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education as well as the Civil Society.
Inaugurating the panel known as the Steering Committee for Strengthening Institutional and Community Responses to End Gender-Based Violence/Domestication of Enugu State Gender Policy using the Oputa Panel approach, Governor Peter Mbah restated his administration’s commitment to not bringing perpetrators of GBV to book, but also putting in place proactive measures – activities, infrastructure, and systems in place to prevent them.
Mbah, who was represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Chidiebere Onyia, said, “We take gender-based violence seriously. We have zero tolerance for it, and in Enugu State, we are ready to go the extra mile to deal with it.
“If you notice, the government has selected people that are very committed to this goal. This is not an activity where we just want to check-off the list. We will track this. We will monitor this, and we will have quarterly engagements on the successes that this particular committee has achieved in terms of reference that we are going to send.
“We will tighten those terms of reference indicators, so that we monitor what we are doing both in terms of cost input and the value added. It’s very important to us. Many people will be involved – civil society, the police and various ministries.”
He however, said that the effort was to protect everyone, men and women alike, as GBV was not restricted to any gender.
“The whole idea is to hold people responsible that are involved in matters relating to gender violence and deter people that by culture or by association get involved in that, protect women, protect our children, and in the case of violence against men, protect our men because most times we misconstrue gender violence to mean women, but it can also be men too.
“We encourage our men to speak out and to make sure they understand that the policy that Enugu State is soon going to domesticate is for everyone, and not only for the female gender,” he stated.
In her remark, Mrs. Enih, explained that the Oputa Panel approach was inspired by the need to cover all local peculiarities in domesticating the policy on GBV, restarting government’s confidence in the members of the panel.
“The approach we are going to use is the Oputa Panel approach, and in the Oputa Panel approach, we are going to tour the 17 Local Government Areas to get firsthand information about what our people are going through because policy is meant for the people, and a policy should suit the people.
“Again, every community has its peculiar problems, so that’s why the government decided that if we have to domesticate the gender policy, we have to hear from the people who own the policy and know the changes that they desire to see. That is the reason we are using this approach.
“The committee members are to also serve as judges. As we gather this information from our people, we will come back to tailor it in a way to suit the people of Enugu State, and then our policy is ready.
“We want the people to know that there is a gender policy for them. I can assure you that when the people are aware that there is such a policy, they will seek for the enforcement of that policy. So, this is not going to be one of those policies that will just lie on the shelf,” she said.
-
Health4 days ago
Optometry in a Changing World: Adapting to Emerging Trends
-
GRBusiness4 days ago
Borno State Launches Industrial Hub Management to Boost Trade, Investment
-
Culture4 days ago
African Union Declares 2025 the ‘Year of Reparations and African Heritage’ and Launches Decade-Long Action Plan
-
TechNews3 days ago
Samsung Launches Vision AI TV: A New Era in Home Entertainment, Celebrating 19 Consecutive Years as the Global No. 1 TV Brand
-
CampusLife21 hours ago
Samsung Unwraps the Sleek, Durable Galaxy A07 in Nigeria
-
News19 hours ago
Nigeria dismantles terror groups, Ansaru and Mahmuda, with the capture of their leaders
-
Transport21 hours ago
In an Epic Move, Gov Mbah Inaugurates 5 Ultramodern Bus Terminals, Rolls Out 100 Mass Transit CNG Buses Across Enugu