Connect with us

News

Grazing laws: Heavy knocks for Defence minister

Published

on

The Senate, the House of Representatives, Taraba, Ekiti and Benue state governments on Wednesday berated the Minister of Defence, Maj.Gen. Musur Dan-Ali (retd.),  for calling on state governments to suspend their anti-open grazing laws, discribing the call as illegal.

While the Senate and the Benue State Government asked the minister to withdraw his statement, Taraba and Ekiti states rejected the call by Dan-Ali.

The minister, after a security council meeting at the Presidential Villa in Abuja on Tuesday,  had said the suspension of the laws would reduce tension.

The anti-open grazing law is currently operational in Benue, Ekiti and Taraba states.

Dan-Ali, in a statement by his Public Relations Officer, Col. Tukur Guasu, also called for creation of safe routes for herdsmen.

Withdraw  your comment, it’s absurd Senate tells Ali

But the Senate, at the plenary on Wednesday, criticised the minister. The upper chamber of the National Assembly asked him to withdraw his statement.

Raising a point of order, Senator Barnabas Gemade (Benue North-East) faulted Dan-Ali’s statement and urged the Senate to ask the minister to withdraw the statement.

He also stated that the states were empowered by the Land Use Act to take ownership and management of land resources.

The lawmakers unanimously granted Gemade’s prayer to “ask the minister of defence to withdraw his statement on his call for the withdrawal of the anti-open grazing laws in Benue and Taraba as these laws were properly enacted in accordance with the states’ Houses of Assembly.”

Reacting to Dan-Ali’s statement, Gemade said, “This is not the first time that we will hear this kind of absurd statement coming from no less a personality than the minister of defence.  If a minister of defence is calling for anarchy, where else can we find peace?

“We understand that the minister comes from Zamfara State and I wonder if all the killings in Zamfara that are almost equal in number with the ones in Benue, are also as a result of the anti-open grazing law. And if by his own experience, the killings in Zamfara have nothing to do with the anti-open grazing law, why does he believe that the killings in Benue and Taraba states are because they enacted the laws?

“These killings have been on for seven years before the laws came into operation. So, what was responsible for the killings at that time? And now the killings in Zamfara have not ceased, yet they have not made a law prohibiting open grazing. “We think that this republic is probably being misadvised by those who have been given appointments to take responsibility for the good governance of this nation. Therefore, they must be cautioned.”

Gemade added, “It was very strange to me that in the mind of the Minister of Defence of this nation, the only way he can solve the problem of hundreds and thousands of people being killed in Benue and Taraba states is that the laws they made against open grazing of cattle – where you cannot control the conflict between herdsmen and farmers – should be removed, so that whatever semblance of law to keep law and order should be removed and anarchy can go on as was the case before.”

In his submission, Senator John Enoh (Cross River-Central), described Gemade’s arguments as logical.

He said, “If killings had been going on for the past seven years and the enactment of the anti-open grazing laws by Benue, Taraba and Ekiti states was just about one year ago, what it means is that going against the laws will not be the solution to the killings. That means the anti-open grazing law is not the reason why the killings are taking place in the states.”

Don’t suspend anti-open grazing laws, Reps tell FG, NSC

Also, the House of Representatives asked the National Security Council not to direct states to suspend  their respective anti-open grazing laws.

The House said such a directive would infringe on the constitutional powers of the states to make laws for the security and welfare of their citizenry.

It passed the resolution after a member from Benue State, Mr. John Dyegh, brought up the NSC’ decision under matters of public importance.

Dyegh, a member of the All Progressives Congress, reminded members that the 1999 Constitution empowered state Houses of Assembly to make laws for the states.

He cited some laws made by states before the anti-open grazing laws like the laws prohibiting the sale of alcohol and prostitution.

The lawmaker noted that it smacked of hypocrisy to say some laws were acceptable, while others were not.

He added, “The laws against sale of alcohol and prostitution are there. They are still being implemented as we speak, no matter how inconvenient they are to the victims.

“Why is the anti-open grazing law an issue? Under the Land Use Act, land is vested in the hands of the state to hold in trust for the people. Why is the law against open grazing such an issue to them?”

Rather than asking the states to suspend their laws, the House called on the Federal Government to submit a supplementary budget to develop cattle colonies in the 11 states that volunteered land for the purpose.

The session, which was presided over by the Speaker, Mr. Yakubu Dogara, passed the resolution in a unanimous voice vote.

Your statement is offensive, Ortom tells minister

Also, the Benue State Governor, Samuel Ortom,  has faulted the minister.

The governor, through the Commissioner of Information and Orientation, Mr. Lawrence Onoja Jnr. asked the minister to withdraw the statement.

Ortom, who expressed surprise at the minister’s statement, noted that his outburst was at variance with the position of the National Economic Council, presided over by the Vice-President, Prof. Yemi Osinbanjo, which had endorsed ranching as the best global practice.

The governor stated, “We call on Mansur Dan-Ali to, as a matter of urgency, withdraw this highly offensive statement against Benue State and the victims of herdsmen killings in the state.

“Over 500 Benue indigenes have so far lost their lives to herdsmen invasion of the state since the New Year day.”

The governor said that while  the minister was dissipating his energy on the law, he had yet to call for the arrest and prosecution of the Miyeiti Allah leaders who had allegedly openly and consistently threatened more bloodshed in Benue on account of the law.

He said that the state government had acted within the ambit of the constitution, which empowers states to make laws for the good governance of the people.

Ortom said that there was no going back on the implementation of the law as prosecution of offenders was going on smoothly.

“We have no apologies to the Minister of Defence or anyone,” he said.

Benue Assembly calls for Ali’s resignation

But the state House of Assembly at its plenary on Wednesday called for the resignation of the defence minister, describing his statement as “unfortunate.”

The Majority Leader, Benjamin Adayin, had raised a motion of public importance condemning the statement of the minister. He moved a motion for condemning the minister’s statement and passing vote of no confidence in him.

Members including John Ahubi, Sule Audu and, Benjamin Mguthyor representing Otukpo/Akpa, Agatu and Tarka constituencies respectively lambasted the minister.

The resolution of the House,  which was read by the Speaker, Terkimbir Ikyabir, condemned  the statement of the minister.

He said that the House passed a vote of no confidence in  Dan-Ali and asked him to resign his appointment with immediate effect.

Ali’s demand, affront to federalism, says Fayose

On his part, the Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, said the call by the minister was an affront to federalism practised in the country.

In his tweeter handle, Fayose wondered why it was difficult for the Federal Government to support cattle ranching.

Fayose stated, “Call by the Federal Government  through the Minister of Defence, Dan-Ali, that states should suspend implementation of the anti-grazing law is an affront to federalism that is practised in Nigeria. It is amazing that at the level of the Presidency, they still see states as appendages of the Federal Government.

“January this year, the minister of defence blamed passage of anti-grazing law in some states as the cause of killings by herdsmen; today, he is still singing the same song. Is there something to this old system of nomadic cattle rearing that they are not telling Nigerians?

“Why is @MBuhari not rearing his cows through open grazing? Why is it so difficult for the Federal Government to support cattle ranching? Here in Ekiti, the anti-open grazing law stays. It is the Presidency that should stop looking the other way while herdsmen go about killing Nigerians.

“I think the Presidency should be concerned about how to take the herdsmen out of the bush and give them decent life by embracing cattle ranching. How can anyone be pleased subjecting his own people to a life of following cows through the bush from Yobe to Lagos?”

Fayose later issued a statement where he argued that the Federal Government lacked the power to suspend or abrogate the anti-grazing laws enacted by the state governments to prohibit open grazing of cattle in their states.

In the statement signed by his Chief Press Secretary, Mr. Idowu Adelusi, on Wednesday, Fayose hinged his submission on the fact that “the country is a federation and that Ekiti is one of the federating units and the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is clear on what each unit can legislate on.

“On this subject, the Federal Government has no control and cannot interfere. This is a matter of law.

“I want the Federal Government to know that we are operating a democratic system and that we are not in the military era when the government is run by decrees and fiats. Those in the Federal Government contemplating to suspend a law enacted by the state can only be appointed by a quasi-military government and not a pure civilian government.

“Let them know that the Ekiti State Anti-grazing Law has come to stay and we have no apology for that. Where were they when our farmers were being hacked down in various parts of the state?”

We won’t suspend our anti-grazing law – Taraba gov

Also, the Senior Special Assistant to the Governor of Taraba State on Media, Mr. Bala Dan Abu, who responded on behalf of Governor Darius Ishaku, said the state would not suspend the law, adding that the defence minister and the Federal Government lacked the power to ask a state to dump its law.

He stated,  “ I’ve read about his call that the anti-open grazing laws by state governments should be suspended. I think his position is a misconception of what the laws by the various state governments are set out to achieve or maybe he’s just pretending not to understand the issues relating to killings by herdsmen. Killings have not just started in the Middle  Belt states, in the North and other parts of the country.

“If the open grazing law is the problem, how does he want to explain killings in Kaduna, Zamfara and Kogi states that have no such law? He is pretending, he understands the issue and that is why we, in Taraba State, are rejecting his call for the suspension of our anti-open grazing law.

“We will not suspend our law because we are running a federal system of government and so a state is free to make laws that will suit its people. Anyway, the suspension of the law is not the solution to the problem of killings in the country particularly killings carried out by Fulani herdsmen.

“The solution to the problem rests with the Federal Government because it has all the mercenaries to deal with the issue. The Federal Government is in control of all the security apparatus of the country, the problem is that the security agents are not getting the right instructions and even when they give them the right instructions, the political will to do the right thing is not there. So, the defence minister and all his security chiefs and the police should do the right things and they should not take sides like they have been doing.”

Minister’s call illegal, says OPC

The Oodua People’s Congress also lambasted the minister of defence.

The founder of the OPC, Dr. Frederick Fasehun, in a statement on Wednesday described the call as unconstitutional.

Fasehun described the call as “contradicting Section 4(7) of the constitution that empowers state Houses of Assembly to make laws for the good governance in their areas.”

He also hailed the National Assembly for its fresh attempt to impeach President Muhammadu Buhari.

The OPC founder said Buhari had failed to understand that free media, legislature and the judiciary remained the cornerstone of any democracy.

Describing the National Assembly’s resolve as a bold and patriotic step to curtail dictatorship and executive lawlessness, the OPC urged Nigerians to support the move.

I only made a suggestion, minister insists

But  reacting to criticisms, the Minister of Defence said his recommendation should be treated as a suggestion and no more.

The Public Relations Officer to the minister, Col. Tukur Gusau, when asked on Wednesday to comment on the lawmakers’ statement, said the minister had only made suggestions, adding that he was not aware of any such comments from the senators.

Gusau said, “The minister is only making a suggestion. Of course, we agree states can make laws, but he is only making a suggestion. I am not aware that the Senate has made any such pronouncement. Let us give it time. Let us hear what they said. For now, I cannot say anything. You are the one telling me.”

….Punchng.com

GrassRoots.ng is on a critical mission; to objectively and honestly represent the voice of ‘grassrooters’ in International, Federal, State and Local Government fora; heralding the achievements of political and other leaders and investors alike, without discrimination. This daily, digital news publication platform serves as the leading source of up-to-date information on how people and events reflect on the global community. The pragmatic articles reflect on the life of the community people, covering news/current affairs, business, technology, culture and fashion, entertainment, sports, State, National and International issues that directly impact the locals.

Continue Reading

News

The Peruvian Government Has Officially Classified Transgender, Nonbinary And Intersex People As “Mentally ill”

Published

on

According to the country’s ministry of health, the controversial decision was made to ensure the country’s public health services could “guarantee full coverage of medical attention for mental health” for the trans community.

It also categorises “dual-role transvestitism,” “fetishistic transvestism,” and “other gender identity disorders” under the same bracket of mental illness.

The new law will change language in the Essential Health Insurance Plan (PEAS) to reflect the view of trans and intersex people as a mental health disorder.

Trans groups across Peru have loudly condemned the decision as a step backwards for the country’s already complex relationship with LGBTQ+ rights.

Continue Reading

News

Math Teacher Accused Of Having Sex With 2 Students And Getting Pregnant For One Tearfully Reveals The Baby Was Taken Away From Her

Published

on

The UK teacher who had a baby with an underage student while on trial for having sex with another teenage boy broke down in court after revealing her newborn baby girl had been “taken away” from her.

Manchester math teacher Rebecca Joynes, 30, sobbed to jurors over how her baby was taken “24 hours after being born” this past January — and now she only sees her for nine hours a week, Joynes told jurors on Monday, May 13, according to the Manchester Evening News.

“At the moment I have contact with her three times a week for three hours and that’s it,” she said through tears.

Joynes was arrested and released on bail on orders not to have unsupervised contact with anyone under 18 after allegedly grooming her pupil, known as Boy A in court, by buying him a $430 Gucci belt before bringing him to her apartment for unprotected sex.

She was suspended from school and eventually fired, but soon after, she began having a relationship with a 15-year-old boy, known in court as Boy B, whom she had a baby with in January.

Joynes, who has denied having sex with either boy when they were underage, told the court that when she learned of the allegations against her she had gone to the second boy in a “panic” and he deleted all of her phone’s content.

The former teacher denied having a sexual relationship with the second boy until after he turned 16 and she was already suspended from teaching.

According to her narration,

She said he had added her on Snapchat twice, which she only accepted the second time because she thought he “wanted to tell her something.”

Joynes said a friendship developed and he quickly became her “best friend” even though the boy would make flirtatious and sexualized comments toward her when he was drunk.

She told jurors that it wasn’t until after his 16th birthday that he messaged her saying “I’ve left school now” with a winky face.

After she received notice that she had been dismissed from her job, he went to her apartment, where following an emotional conversation, they had sex.

The two then entered a relationship that Joynes described as “quite toxic” telling the court how the teenager was “very controlling.”

After discovering she was pregnant, Joynes hid love notes for the boy to find around her apartment.

The notes eventually led to a piece of baby clothing that had the words “I love my daddy to the moon and back” written on it.

The court was told that she gave birth to their baby girl in January, but following an emergency court hearing, the newborn was taken away from Joynes.

Joynes has denied two counts of sexual activity with Boy A; two counts of sexual activity with Boy B; and two counts of sexual activity with Boy B while being a person in a position of trust.

Her trial is ongoing.

Continue Reading

News

First Man To Receive Pig Kidney Transplant Has Died

Published

on

The first Man to receive a genetically modified pig kidney transplant has died two months after the operation.

Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), which carried out the procedure in March, announced Sunday, May 12, that Richard “Rick” Slayman, 62, has died.

They said there was no indication his death was a result of the transplant.

Transplants of other organs from genetically modified pigs have failed in the past, but the operation on Mr Slayman, who was suffering with end-stage kidney disease, was hailed as a historic milestone.

In addition to kidney disease, Mr Slayman also suffered from Type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

In 2018, he had a human kidney transplant, but it began to fail after five years.

Following his pig kidney transplant on March 16, his doctors confirmed he no longer needed dialysis after the new organ was said to be functioning well.

“Mr Slayman will forever be seen as a beacon of hope to countless transplant patients worldwide and we are deeply grateful for his trust and willingness to advance the field of xenotransplantation,” MGH said in a statement.

Xenotransplantation is the transplanting of living cells, tissues or organs from one species to another.

MGH said it was “deeply saddened” at his sudden death and offered condolences to his family.

Mr Slayman’s relatives said his story was an inspiration.

“Rick said that one of the reasons he underwent this procedure was to provide hope for the thousands of people who need a transplant to survive,” they said.

“Rick accomplished that goal and his hope and optimism will endure forever.

“To us, Rick was a kind-hearted man with a quick-witted sense of humour who was fiercely dedicated to his family, friends, and co-workers,” they added.

While Mr Slayman received the first pig kidney to be transplanted into a human, it is not the first pig organ to be used in a transplant procedure.

Two other patients have received pig heart transplants, but those procedures were unsuccessful as the recipients died a few weeks later.

In one case, there were signs the patient’s immune system had rejected the organ, which is a common risk in transplants.

Continue Reading

Trending