GRBusiness
Controversies Crippling FG’s Treasury Single Account Policy


By Adepegba Rogers
Just few months after the Transparency International (TI) Corruption Index opened a can of worms on how Nigeria has sunk deeper into corruption, despite Muhammadu Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade, Ms. Priti Patel, former Secretary of State for International Development, United Kingdom, has made another debilitating remark. She has called on investors to be wary of investing in Nigeria, under Buhari, with a stern warning that they “should know of the corrosive effect of corruption, as well as the lack of transparency and associated difficulties of doing business in certain countries”.
The camp of President Buhari has not taken this statement lightly. We will all agree that Nigerians can say all they want about Nigeria, but when ugly remarks come from the international community, this government always runs into panic mode. Defensively, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Shehu Garba, urged investors to ignore Ms. Patel, saying her “wicked proposition is lacking in substance and devoid of merit in empirical evidence established by facts”. Garba, in a firefighting approach, trumpeted that the Buhari administration has put in place instruments that have “extraordinarily and unprecedentedly reduced corruption and corrupt practices.” One of these is the Treasury Single Account (TSA) , which has led to greater visibility and control of government funds by way of consolidating government resources in an account as against the past where such accounts are scattered. Bravo!
I personally was looking forward to a mention of the TSA. The Presidency has never failed to force the success of the TSA, alongside Whistle-blower policy and Bank Verification Number (BVN), down the throat of anyone who cares to listen. It is often brandished and chorused as one of this administration’s most remarkable achievement, since it came on board in 2015, so much so, it has become obvious that there is no other thing to brag about in terms of achievement.
Even though the policy was kickstarted by the immediate past president, Goodluck Jonathan, Buhari has completely owned it, following his directive for full implementation in September 2015. Every little occasion has become right to re-echo the gains of the TSA. And to be fair, in terms of cash management, Nigeria is in a much better position because of the TSA. It has saved Nigeria close to N9 trillion since it was enforced, and additionally, it saves the FG about N24 billion monthly. This is the cost previously incurred from running multiple accounts in the days before TSA. Also, over 20,000 bank accounts have been closed.
Despite these gains, what Nigeria has in operation appears to be a caricature of the original policy defined by World Bank. The TSA policy in Nigeria has been bedevilled by major controversies which reflect poorly on the government and may threaten its sustainability, even though it is being hyped as a major success.
The TSA policy recommends ‘SINGLENESS’ in collection of all government revenues, but till date, several leakages occur due to FG’s poor stance on the policy and lack of ownership. Some of the most corruption-infested parastatals in the country, particularly, the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) and Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) are frequent offenders who still find ways to divert funds outside of the treasury. Others include FRSC, INEC, Police Force and some Federal Universities. It will shock most Nigerians to note that, years after the supposed full implementation by Buhari, Nigeria’s foreign earnings are still not channelled through the TSA.
With this massive diversion of revenue in several government agencies, it came as no surprise that ex-President Goodluck Jonathan who exclaimed that ‘stealing is not corruption’, has come out to boast that Nigeria was better off under him.
“It is important to note that despite the many sensational stories, dramatic arrests, seizures and accusations, many of them false, since I left office, the fact remains that Nigeria has not made any improvement on TI Corruption Perception Index since 2014.
“In fact, the 2017 CPI released in 2018 by TI places Nigeria as number 148, a retrogression in which the nation went 12 place backward. In other words, Nigeria is more corrupt in 2017 than it was when I handed over to Buhari administration in 2015. Some people may be misled with smoke and mirrors but the TI Corruption Perception Index relies on unsentimental facts and figures,” Jonathan submitted in his new book, My Transition Hour.
Another major controversy rocking the TSA is the outstanding debt and burden of transaction cost. When the TSA was fully adopted in 2015, the government agreed to pay SystemSpecs (the owners of Remita), banks and other payment providers. Under this arrangement, the government had a contractual obligation to pay a charge of 1% to the cap of N5,000. It was an excellent deal for the government as similar payment systems in Nigeria and foreign countries range between 1.5% and 3%. About a year after this agreement was made, the government reneged, called for a refund of commission due to service providers and held on to their payments for over two years. The debt accrued shot up above N10 billion, yet the TSA continued to run while the service providers groaned under the unfair treatment of the government.
On 1 November 2018, without any warning or sensitisation of members of the public, who actually pay into the TSA, the FG suddenly transferred the transaction cost of TSA to payers using the Remita platform. Not only that, amidst the huge debt, Ahmed Idris, the Accountant-General of the Federation, claimed that the TSA in the past two years has been serviced by N16 billion.
“Within the last two years, the government spent almost N16 billion in this direction which ordinarily should be borne by those making payments. So, it is time for Nigerians to pay for the services that they receive, and the government will take whatever is due to it without necessarily incurring cost. In the old tariff regime, the Federal Government bore the charges on all transactions to the service providers on behalf of payers,” the AGF said.
No one has challenged the government with these questions: First, why has the government failed to pay service providers for the past two years? Second, where did the N16 billion quoted by the AGF, go in the past two years, if service providers have not been paid? Third, why should the citizens be forced to pay for a service that the federal government signed up for to collects its own revenue, without being informed?
Also, the FG continues to show an unequalled level of disregard for the indigenous companies. A Nigerian company, SystemSpecs was able to deploy Remita, even when other foreign software failed, and the TSA was to be suspended for another two years.
Nigeria has always been known to invest heavily in foreign technologies. According to the President of Institute of Software Practitioners of Nigeria (ISPON), Mr. Olorogun James Emadoye, GIFMIS at Office of the Accountant General of the Federation is powered by a software from Estonia; IPPIS at the OAGF is powered by a software from United States; ITAS at Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) is powered by a software from Canada; Bank Verification Number (BVN) at Nigeria Interbank Settlement System (NIBSS) is powered by a software from Germany; RTGS at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is powered by a software from Sweden while most of the software in Nigeria banks are India, Jordan and others. The yearly capital flight as a result of preference for offshore software is estimated to have risen from N200 billion in 2012 to N400 billion. This covers the acquisition and maintenance of the software used in both the public and private sectors.
The government has not only botched the agreement with SystemSpecs, it has also not seen the need to recognise the success of indigenous technology in powering a policy of such strategic importance. If the TSA was run by a foreign service provider, the huge cost implications in terms of maintenance charges will be gladly shouldered, with contract terms highly upheld to keep the project running.
The existing presidential directive that SystemSpecs be paid all agreed percentage was stalemated for two years without implementation, and with commencement of new pricing regime, the company may be pressured into forgoing an accrued debt of over N10 billion.
Like Ms. Patel alleged, it is always a problem for Nigerian government to honour contractual obligations either for investors coming into the country or with Nigerian firms doing business in the country. As a matter of fact, when it comes to Ease of Business, Nigeria has paid more attention to foreigners, than Nigerians.
The government’s role in business does not only “demonstrates the risks of investment into Nigeria,” but the unimaginable plight of Nigerian-owned business dealing with the government. We must first learn to do business with ourselves, before we let foreign investors expose the rot in our system to the world.
Rogers writes from Ilorin
GRBusiness
Borno State Launches Industrial Hub Management to Boost Trade, Investment


Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, governor of Borno state, has approved the establishment of a dedicated management unit for the Borno State Industrial Hub, aimed at enhancing trade and attracting investment within the state.
According to a statement from Bukar Tijani, secretary to the State Government, the administration is committed to strengthening the hub’s operations and drawing more investors to the region.
“His Excellency, Governor Babagana Umara Zulum has approved the establishment of a dedicated Borno State Industrial Hub Management Unit to further strengthen the operations of the Industrial Hub in Maiduguri, improve efficiency, and attract more investment into the State,” the statement read.
Located in Maiduguri, the state capital, the Industrial Hub is a multi-facility complex designed to stimulate economic growth through diversified manufacturing and processing activities.
Current operations include production facilities for solar panels, waste recycling, and food processing, covering ginger, tomato, cassava, and onion, as well as manufacturing lines for corn chips, biscuits, and school furniture.
Since its inception, the hub has shown significant potential to revitalize local industries and create jobs.
To oversee its progress, Governor Zulum appointed Engr. Bukar Kolomi, senior technical adviser to the Governor, as the Industrial Hub Manager, placing the unit under the Ministry of Trade, Investment and Tourism.
Commissioned in 2019 to serve as a catalyst for economic recovery following years of insurgency, the Industrial Hub has faced challenges including stalled activities, infrastructure deficits and security issues.
However, the recent appointment of a dedicated management team signals a renewed focus on addressing these challenges and unlocking the hub’s long-promised role in driving local production and employment.


The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) says that no fewer than 1,000 companies, representing 20% of total eligible firms, have begun integrating its newly launched electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) system less than two weeks after it went live.
The FIRS e-invoicing platform, which went live on August 1, 2025, after a successful pilot phase that began in November 2024, was designed to modernise Nigeria’s tax administration, curb evasion, and enhance transparency in revenue generation. It also provides the FIRS with real-time visibility into commercial transactions, ensuring authenticity and completeness of invoices.
According to a statement by Dare Adekanmbi, special adviser on Media to FIRS Chairman Zacch Adedeji, at least 1,000 companies, representing 20% of more than 5,000 eligible firms, have already adopted the system and begun integrating with the FIRS platform.
Adekanmbi noted that the initiative, also known as the Merchant-Buyer Model, will be rolled out in phases. “Large taxpayers, which are companies with annual turnover of N5 billion and more, are expected to be the first to be onboarded on the platform,” he said.
FIRS revealed that MTN Nigeria was the first taxpayer to transmit live electronic invoices to the platform, while Huawei Nigeria and IHS Nigeria have concluded test transmissions and are expected to go live soon.
The agency added that the initial compliance deadline of August 1, 2025, has been extended by three months to accommodate companies currently facing onboarding challenges. The new deadline is now November 1, 2025.


Key players and experts in Nigeria’s oil and gas and power sectors have called for concerted measures and actions that will lead to property utilization of the country’s vast gas reserves.
Key players and experts in Nigeria’s oil and gas and power sectors have called for concerted measures and actions that will lead to property utilization of the country’s vast gas reserves.
They expressed the opinion that Nigeria’s gas reserves are critical asset towards achieving the ongoing energy transition that will be affordable and sustainable.
Speaking at the 4th Oriental News conference in Lagos on Thursday July 24,2025 themed’ , “Integrating Nigeria’s Gas Potentials into Strategic Energy Transition Initiatives,” the Manager, Energy Transition NLNG, Temitope Ogedengbe, advised that Nigeria must avoid adopting a “copy-paste” approach to energy transition, insisting that the country must tailor its strategy to reflect local realities, including the urgent need for economic growth, energy security, and national development.
“Our transition must leverage our unique strengths and resources to grow our economy,” Ogedengbe said. “Energy transition should not be a copy-paste exercise.
“Nigeria must design its own, since we need economic development, energy security, and to address developmental issues.”
Ogedengbe, while highlighting challenges around gas utilisation, lamented that despite Nigeria’s abundant natural gas resources, a large portion is still being flared or reinjected due to the absence of viable commercial arrangements.
“We’re not taking nearly the amount we should be. We are still failing and reinjecting because there is no commercial arrangement to optimise this; for many reasons,” he stated.
He noted that while marginal fields hold potential, they are difficult to produce economically.
“The issues there are marginal fields, which are difficult to produce,” he said, adding that the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission’s (NUPRC) Gas Flaring Commercialisation Programme is trying to address this.
According to him, a significant chunk of Nigeria’s gas is still either exported or flared, while domestic utilisation and value addition remain underdeveloped.
“We are not investing enough, and we are not examining the right approaches,” he added.
Speaking on the global LNG market, Ogedengbe noted that although there is still a market for LNG produced by Nigeria, demand patterns are shifting, particularly in Europe, where buyers now favour lower-carbon LNG options.
He said, “There is still a market for LNG produced in Nigeria, but what is happening is that Europe is asking for lower-carbon LNG.
“There’s a need to use operational levers to reduce carbon, attract premium markets, and unlock funding opportunities, including through reduced taxes and levies.”
He further stated the NLNG remains central to Nigeria’s gas future, revealing that the company plans to expand its capacity to 30 million tonnes per annum.
” As part of its energy transition strategy, the company is integrating technologies and processes aimed at reducing emissions and generating carbon credits.
“We’re using offsets to reduce our emissions, both at the national and international levels, to take carbon out of the atmosphere and promote our operations,” he explained.
Ogedengbe emphasized the need for a multi-pronged, well-coordinated approach to decarbonising the country’s gas sector to ensure long-term viability and global competitiveness.
Also, at the same conference, former Power Minister, Prof. Bart Nnaji said that shortage of gas supply and infrastructure deficit has continued to act as disincentive to investment and growth of the power sector.
Nnaji, said in the next two decades power generation in the country will be dominated by gas fired plants.
He attributed Nigeria’s persistent gas shortage to inadequate investment in gas infrastructure and called for more support from both government and the private sector.
Nnaji, who chaired the event, addressed stakeholders from across the oil and gas value chain, including key government officials.
He said the country’s gas sector remains underdeveloped due to insufficient investment in extraction, transmission, and transportation.
“The focus should not rest solely on government-led efforts — the private sector must also play a vital role,” the former minister said.
“What we need is for the government to act as a true enabler, offering the necessary support for infrastructure and gas harvesting. It’s baffling that with over 210 trillion cubic feet of gas, we still face local shortages.
“We’re unable to produce sufficient quantities to support operations across the country. Though operations improved this year, they weren’t previously at full capacity. A seventh train is underway, but we need more gas.”
He said Nigeria’s history of mining and exporting coal before abandoning it reflects a wider pattern of resource neglect.
Nnaji said gas-fired plants are critical to Nigeria’s power generation, emphasising the need for a reliable supply to ensure thermal plants operate effectively.
He noted that Geometric Power Ltd, which he chairs, is among the companies generating electricity through thermal sources.
“For effective supply from thermal plants, an adequate and reliable gas supply is vital. While we have hydro power, gas-fired plants remain dominant and will likely stay that way for the next ten to twenty years,” he said.
Nnaji acknowledged the role of renewable energy in rural electrification but maintained that Nigeria’s baseload power must continue to come from gas or hydro sources.
He noted that hydro power, however, comes with limitations that require regional cooperation.
In her submission, Engr. Chichi Emenike, Acting Managing Director and Gas Asset Manager of Neconde Energy Limited, sounded alarm over the consequences of some policies of Government that has undermined the ongoing energy transition.
According to her, unpaid gas supplies, dollarised operations, and policy inconsistencies are discouraging investment in the sector.
Emenike, said Neconde, for instance, has gas that has been produced and supplied to the electricity generation companies (GenCos) and that has not been paid for almost two years now.”
“This is a serious conundrum, whereas we have sourced funds from somewhere to produce these gas molecules from our facilities. How am I going to pay back?”
Emenike further explained that Nigeria’s upstream gas production is highly dollarised, making it costlier than crude oil development and difficult to sustain without a commercially viable framework.
“Don’t forget that the gas production industry is highly dollarised, including the requisite inputs. There is no part of the operation, including the technology, that is produced locally. The bulk of it has to be imported in US$.
“The O&M, well drilling, and accessories to drill a gas well are all dollarised. So, it costs more than what it costs to drill a crude oil well. The handling of a gas well is highly sophisticated, unlike that of crude oil.”
Speaking on systemic issues within the gas-to-power value chain, Engr. Emenike said, “Over 500 million standard cubic feet (scf) of gas are being transported with the NGIC pipeline.
“If you multiply this figure by one dollar, you will understand the cost. Whereas so much money went into drilling some of these wells, it costs $35,000 plus or minus, and that is outside other assumptions of fees.”
Commenting on the financing and investment environment, Emenike called for a pragmatic national energy plan that begins with achievable goals, rather than lofty ambitions.
“Let us start with what is doable; I mean the low-hanging fruit. Let us stop with big numbers. We should tidy up small fields that are struggling to juggle both CAPEX and OPEX.
“We need to sit down once as a nation to be selfish enough to determine what is needed to take care of Nigeria’s economy alone in the Gulf of Guinea.”
She called for urgent clarity on Nigeria’s position in the energy transition and a realistic approach to funding.
“Where do we sit as Nigerians today on this energy transition plan? Where is the money to run the transition?
“Presently in Nigeria, it is difficult for a gas investor to determine end-to-end where the funds would be coming from. We need a strategy; we need to be serious. Or else, gas investors would rather take what they should have invested in the Nigerian economy to Mozambique or elsewhere.”
Emenike further warned about the economic risks associated with policy instability.
“Gas economics is such that it must be end-to-end. Even before you draw down the first financing, you have tied that investment to a commercial arrangement.
“When you have a business, as much as you think you know, in the case of Nigeria, once you put your leg out in this economy, you will see so many things flood in unexpectedly. Your IRR (rate of return) goes down the drain due to policy flip-flops and multiplicities of levies and fees.”
She insisted that the sector needs regulatory reforms and an end to what she described as rent-seeking behaviour by government agencies.
“We have to deal with the rent-seeking attitude of our regulators to enable investors repatriate their investment financing.
“They should stop flogging investors with all forms of regulations and later charge them with potential incidents of non-conformity, which translates to fines, even for not operating, after they have created the crisis.”
Calling for collaborative efforts, she advocated infrastructure sharing and coordination within the value chain.
“We need to leverage infrastructure to unlock the stranded assets across the country. We need to look at how to put together our war chest to achieve a lot for the industry. We need to set the rules of the game.”
She emphasised the importance of investor confidence and a market-driven approach.
“Every investor wants to see a clear line of sight. Market forces should be allowed to play out. The government should not create a monopolistic environment that stifles investment. They should allow it to have that flexibility.”
“None of these government officials understand how investors raise capital to finance their projects and the terms of it. Government has no business in business. They should stop the rent-seeking attitude and stop looking for short-term benefits. Quick fixes will not work.”
She has therefore challenged the FG to focus inwardly and begin with achievable solutions.
According to her, “There is much more to be gained if we have a very selfish Nigerian plan that focuses on Nigerian interests alone. This can service the entire Gulf of Guinea if we are serious. Let us start with the small gas fields.
She further urged the FG to stop putting benchmarks on gas for power, adding that the market forces should be allowed to dictate the price.
Engr. Emenike charged the Nigerian government to allow flexibility in the market and encourage alliances within the value chain operators.
-
Agriculture4 days ago
Enugu Govt to Establish Food and Nutrition Units
-
Health2 days ago
Optometry in a Changing World: Adapting to Emerging Trends
-
Education4 days ago
NELFUND Disburses ₦86.3 Billion to Students
-
Culture2 days ago
African Union Declares 2025 the ‘Year of Reparations and African Heritage’ and Launches Decade-Long Action Plan
-
GRBusiness2 days ago
Borno State Launches Industrial Hub Management to Boost Trade, Investment
-
GRPolitics5 days ago
2027: Again, Enugu North Endorses Gov Mbah over Massive Projects, UNN VC
-
GRTech4 days ago
Rubrik and Sophos to Deliver Microsoft 365 Cyber Resilience with New Partnership
-
GRTech4 days ago
Ransomware in the Crosshairs: Sophos and Halcyon Announce New Intelligence-Sharing and Mutual Anti-Tamper Protection Initiative