Connect with us

GROpinion

PDP: A Historic Comeback From the Brinks

Published

on

By Chibueze Daniel

Although the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had denied any political influence over its decision to postpone the 2019 presidential and National Assembly elections; although the presidency and ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) have both expressed anger and disappointment at INEC, the general perception out there favours the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar’s description of the postponement as the hand of Esau and voice of Jacob. It favours PDP’s official statement alleging that INEC literally bowed to political pressure to save President Muhammadu Buhari and APC from imminent whitewash.

Interestingly, INEC also postponed elections in 2011 and 2015 under the PDP. Ahead of the PDP elections in particular, the PDP was factionalised, leading to the biggest threat to its stranglehold on presidency from a coalition of parties and potent political forces that merged as the APC. The international community was also breathing hard on the government of former President Goodluck Jonathan, which it “perceived” as weak in fighting corruption and insurgency.

Today, the roles and circumstances have virtually reversed, with the APC at the receiving end. The prolific analyst, Ikechukwu Amaechi, summarises the reversal and APC’s chances this way: “In 2015, Buhari contested against Jonathan, a Southern minority Christian with no political base. Today, he is running against one of the most formidable politicians in this dispensation, a man with a solid political base, clout and deep pocket, a Fulani Moslem, from a region – North East – that last held power when Tafawa Balewa from Bauchi State was the Prime Minister in the First Republic.

“In 2015, the APC went into the election as a united, pragmatic and determined party hungry for power, eager to make a resounding political statement against a highly fractious, disorganised and disoriented PDP.

“Today, the reverse is the case. A strong, rejuvenated and virile PDP is going into Saturday’s election against a highly fractured, hemorrhaging APC where some governors are not on talking terms with the National Chairman, Adams Oshiomhole.

“Five years ago, some governors elected on the platform of the PDP defected to the newly formed APC. It was a political tsunami. In 2018, three APC governors kissed goodbye to the party and went back to PDP together with the incumbent Senate President, Bukola Saraki, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara. Most of the PDP bigwigs that defected to APC in 2014, thus making Buhari’s victory possible, have gone back to PDP. These include grassroots mobilisers like Rabiu Musa Kwakwanso, two-term governor of Kano State, former Defence Minister and scion of the Talakawa School of politics.

“In many states, debilitating intra-party squabble has shredded APC. In Rivers for instance, the supremacy battle between Rotimi Amaechi, former governor of the state and incumbent Minister of Transportation and Senator Magnus Abe has ensured that the party will not field any candidate in these elections.

“In 2015, it was the PDP presidential campaign convoys that were stoned, booed and jeered. Today, it is the APC’s. Buhari nearly took a stone meant for Oshiomhole at a campaign rally in Abeokuta”.

“Short of blatant and unconscionable rigging, the kind that will be so obvious the electorate will be hard put tolerating or ignoring, Buhari will be roundly defeated on Saturday”.

“The PDP has dramatically reinvented itself and staged a remarkable comeback. The APC cannot because of its inherent contradictions.”

So, if the PDP says that a frightened APC pressured INEC to postpone the last Saturday polls, it must be speaking from experience. But beyond the brickbats over the postponement, even beyond which party eventually wins on 23rdFebruary, is the most pulsating and surprising comebacks in our political history staged by the PDP, which looks so favoured to clinch the presidency.

Nobody thought it was possible in 2015, 2016, and even up to May 2017 after the party’s fall from power, mass defections, the Ali-Modu sheriff leadership crisis, and both the justified and unjustified clampdown on its chieftains by the security and anti-corruption agencies, notably the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), police, and Department of State Services (DSS).

PDP rally in Ekiti State

The Deputy Senate President, Chief Ike Ekweremadu, a key actor in the reinvention of the once comatose party, relived the PDP journey from the half-dead to the threshold of power during a radio programme in Enugu where he was reported as saying that his decision, along with several PDP chieftains, to remain with the PDP in its darkest hours despite political persecutions was to ensure that Nigeria did not slump into a one-party state.

Several papers reported him as saying: “The beauty of democracy is vibrant opposition. After we lost the presidential election, I made my stand on rebuilding the PDP clear. I didn’t nurse any illusion that it would be a smooth ride, but I was determined to pay the price.

“We were able to put things together, including zoning the presidential ticket to the North through the Panel I was privileged to chair, to ensure that our northern big wigs, including our presidential candidate, returned to the PDP.

“Together with our friends, colleagues, our governors and some other people, we were able to rebuild the PDP. Today, when you watch the rallies, you say oh, this is a huge crowd for APC in Adamawa or that was a huge PDP crowd in Katsina, the home of the President. That is an interesting thing and that is exactly what we worked for.

“I am proud to see the product of those efforts manifest. I am happy when I see this close contest and by the grace of God, PDP will win. You couldn’t say the same thing about the party in 2016, for instance, because then, the party was in shambles”.

I cannot agree more. I can only add that in addition to its internal wrangling occasioned mainly by the greed of a few bent cornering the entire levers and benefits of power, APC’s palpable incompetence also played a major part. Senator Saraki alluded to this on return to the PDP when he said that “the PDP has learnt more from its defeat than APC has learnt from its victory”.  

Whether PDP retakes power or APC miraculously rescues its burning nuts from the fire of opposition and anger of Nigerians, the tight presidential contest is good for our democracy.

None of the two dominant parties would ever take Nigerians for granted again, thus the hope for good governance is brightest post May 29, 2019.

Therefore, whatever anybody thinks about men like Ekweremadu, Ayo Fayose, Nyesom Wike, Ahmed Maikarfi, David Mark, Enyinnaya Abaribe, all the PDP governors (none of whom defected), and a host of others, including many faithful PDP federal lawmakers, history will be kind to them for refusing to budge to political pressure and patronages. Instead, they choose to go into the trenches against a hitherto emerging one-party state that would have spelt doom for our democracy. 

Daniel writes from Aba

GrassRoots.ng is on a critical mission; to objectively and honestly represent the voice of ‘grassrooters’ in International, Federal, State and Local Government fora; heralding the achievements of political and other leaders and investors alike, without discrimination. This daily, digital news publication platform serves as the leading source of up-to-date information on how people and events reflect on the global community. The pragmatic articles reflect on the life of the community people, covering news/current affairs, business, technology, culture and fashion, entertainment, sports, State, National and International issues that directly impact the locals.

Continue Reading

GROpinion

Insecurity In Zamfara – Hold Lawal Accountable, Not Matawalle

Writes Nasiru Aliyu, Media Advisor to the Hon. Minister

Published

on

Zamfara and Bandits

The recent protest organized by the All Progressives Congress (APC) Akida Forum raises significant questions about political motivations and accountability.

Led by Musa Mahmoud the APC AKIDA group staged a demonstration at the Abuja headquarters of the Department of State Services (DSS), demanding an investigation into the Minister of State for Defence, Dr. Bello Mohammed Matawalle, amid allegations linking him to banditry in the state.

The protest, predominantly featuring hired women and youths from Abuja, was framed as a response to escalating security concerns in Zamfara.

However, the underlying motives appear to be rooted in political rivalry rather than genuine concern for public safety.

The leader of the APC Akida Forum Tijjani Ramallan claims that Governor Dauda Lawal has accused Matawalle of collusion with bandits, suggesting that such ties have perpetuated the insecurity plaguing the region.

A critical point overlooked by Mahmoud and his supporters is that Matawalle is no longer the executive governor of Zamfara.

The current governor, Dauda Lawal, now holds the title of the state’s chief security officer, and therefore, he bears the primary responsibility for addressing the security crisis.

Instead of engaging in a blame game, Lawal should focus on implementing effective strategies to combat the rampant insecurity and provide the dividends of democracy to the people of Zamfara state.

The animosity towards Matawalle seems to stem from his previous role as the Director General of Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s campaign in the Northwest, where he played a pivotal role in securing significant electoral support for the current president.

This success has reportedly fueled envy among some political figures like Tijjani Ramallan, including Musa Mahmoud and others who may feel threatened by Matawalle’s rising profile.

It is noteworthy that allegations against Matawalle have been investigated by the National Security Adviser’s office, which found no evidence to support claims of his involvement in banditry.

This investigation contributed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to retain Matawalle in his ministerial position, where he has reportedly managed security matters in the Northwest with professionalism.

Adding to the complexity of this situation, a Kano High Court recently issued a restraining order against Governor Lawal and others, prohibiting them from continuing their smear campaign against Matawalle. This legal development underscores the court’s recognition of the potential harm caused by unfounded allegations and the need for accountability in political discourse and the state government has found an ally in APC AKIDA led by Tijjani Ramallan.

Despite the court’s intervention, Governor Lawal continues to leverage media platforms to tarnish Matawalle’s reputation, linking him to banditry and corruption without substantiating evidence.

Such tactics appear to be desperate attempts to undermine Matawalle’s credibility, likely motivated by Lawal’s desire to solidify his political standing.

The ongoing campaign against Matawalle by Lawal and his associates raises serious concerns about the integrity of political discourse in Zamfara.

It is imperative for the public to remain vigilant against misleading narratives and to recognize the broader implications of such political maneuvers.

The Kano High Court’s ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and the need for responsible governance.

In conclusion, the focus of accountability in Zamfara should shift towards Governor Dauda Lawal, who now holds the reins of security in the state.

Instead of casting blame on former officials, Lawal must take ownership of the security situation and work towards tangible solutions that prioritize the safety and well-being of the people of Zamfara.

Furthermore, since Matawalle operational visit to sokoto led to the elimination of Bandit leader Halilu Sububu who is alleged to have died with the treasure of the sponsors of banditry in zamfara state, the pain propelled them to further embark on campaign of calumny.

Continue Reading

GROpinion

Exposing the Malicious Sabotage of MoMo PSB Project in Enugu Ezike

By: Cyprian Nwodo

Published

on

MoMo Payment Service

The recent activities of some individuals with one Davids Iyida attempting to sabotage the MoMo Payment Service Bank project intended to benefit, especially  Enugu Ezike people, have raised significant concern and outrage within the community.

Davids Iyida
Davids Iyida

Such actions aimed at undermining a project with immense potential to uplift and empower the people of Enugu Ezike can only be described as malicious.

The MoMo PSB project is designed to bring financial services closer to the people of Enugu Ezike, facilitating easier access to banking and financial transactions.

This project is expected to create jobs, stimulate local businesses, and provide a much-needed boost to the local economy. In a region where such opportunities are rare, the MoMo PSB project represents a beacon of hope for many residents.

It is particularly baffling and disheartening to witness a member of the community collaborate with outsiders to hinder the progress of their own people.

The reasons behind such alliances remain unclear, but the impact of these actions is evident and deeply troubling. Working to obstruct the project is not only delaying progress but also actively working against the welfare and advancement of Enugu Ezike.

The efforts to destroy Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu’s good intention, despite all the positive contributions he has made, are nothing short of wickedness.

Adonu, a visionary entrepreneur and the leading MTN Partner in the South East, has dedicated significant resources and efforts to bring the MoMo Payment Service Bank project to fruition.

His vision for the community includes economic growth, financial inclusion, and overall development. Attacking his vision is an attack on the progress and future of Enugu Ezike.

The question that lingers in the minds of many is: Why sabotaging our own benefits? In a time when unity and collective effort are paramount for the community’s advancement, such actions of sabotage are counterproductive and harmful. The community needs all hands on deck to drive development and improve the quality of life for its residents. Internal conflicts and malicious actions only serve to set back these efforts.

Despite the challenges and the malicious attempts to derail the project, it is important to reaffirm that S Mobile Group vision for establishing a MoMo Payment Service Bank in Enugu Ezike will prevail.

The community stands behind this vision, recognizing the immense benefits it promises to bring. Efforts to hinder progress will ultimately fail in the face of collective determination and support.

The actions of these ungrateful individuals, aimed at sabotaging the MoMo PSB project, are grave disservice to the community of Enugu Ezike.

In a time when progress and development are desperately needed, such malicious activities are deeply regrettable.

However, the vision and determination of Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu and the community’s support ensure that the project will succeed, bringing much-needed growth and prosperity to Enugu Ezike.

Let it be known that no amount of sabotage can dim the light of progress and unity.

Nwodo, a public commentator writes from Enugu State

Continue Reading

Columnists

Cybersecurity in 2024: Towards Ever Greater Sophistication of Tactics

Published

on

Chester Wisniewski, Director Global Field CTO

Writer: CHESTER WISNIEWSKI, Director Global Field CTO, Sophos

With 2024 fast approaching, what are the results for 2023 and what are the developments in the threat landscape for this new year?

The year 2023 was marked by persistence in the tactics of cybercriminals, with the predominance of ransomware, the exploitation of vulnerabilities, theft of credentials and even attacks targeting the supply chain. The common point in all his attacks is their formidable effectiveness.

It is therefore essential to ask what trends will persist in 2024 and what strategies businesses should adopt to deal with these future cyber threats.

Between persistent trends and evolving cybercrime tactics

In 2024, the threat landscape is not expected to change radically, particularly with regard to attack typologies and criminal tactics and procedures.

Criminal groups still primarily focus their attention on financial gains and ransomware remains their weapon of choice. These cybercriminals tend to take the easy way out by opportunistically attacking unpatched security vulnerabilities.

The recent Citrix Bleed attack demonstrated the agility of cybercriminals when it comes to quickly and effectively exploiting these new vulnerabilities.
However, once patches are applied to these vulnerabilities, cyberattackers tend to revert to more common strategies of stealing credentials or, failing that, cookies or session cookies, which, while slightly slower, constitute always a proven means that allows them to penetrate within a system.

In 2024, however, we should expect increased sophistication in defense evasion tactics, particularly due to the generalization of certain technologies such as multi-factor authentication. These attacks will combine malicious proxy servers, social engineering techniques and repeated authentication request attacks or “fatigue attacks”.

AI and regulations will continue to shape cybersecurity

In 2024, the development of AI will have a positive impact on the efficiency of IT teams and security teams by enabling them to strengthen defenses and work more efficiently, including through the processing of vast volumes of data in the aim of detecting anomalies. It should make it possible to respond more quickly in the event of an incident.

Indeed, analysis of attacks in 2023 showed a shortening of the time between network penetration and the triggering of a final attack – using malware or ransomware. The need for rapid detection and response tools to prevent costly incidents is therefore essential.

Finally, regulatory developments could have a major influence on measures taken against ransomware. The need to take more substantial measures could push some states to penalize the payment of ransoms, which would represent a brake on malicious actors and change the perspective of companies in the event of an attack.

Other stricter legislation, such as the implementation of the European NIS2 Directive, is also expected to force companies to take additional measures, particularly regarding their abilities to collect data sets.

To protect themselves against increasingly rapid, effective and costly attacks, companies will need to strengthen their defenses by equipping themselves with tools that allow them to detect and respond to incidents more quickly.

The worsening cybersecurity talent shortage does not appear to be as serious as some studies claim. On the contrary, companies have implemented more lax hiring criteria and more open-mindedness in the recruitment process.

From this perspective, to guarantee their survival in a constantly evolving threat landscape, companies have every interest in establishing partnerships with cybersecurity experts whose main mission is to make the hyperconnected world safer, to advise and assist them. in setting up effective defenses.

Continue Reading

Trending