GROpinion
Effective Leadership recruitment in Nigeria: The Path to Good Governance (Part 2)
Interrogating leadership recruitment in Nigeria
It is a trite knowledge that leaders are not commonly born; they are trained to become that. In the context of leadership, there is always an inexorable interplay between nature and nurture.
Through effective nurturing of the flexible natural talents, leadership traits are developed into a formalized leadership skill set. Leadership entails the capacity and will to rally men and women to a common purpose and character which inspires confidence according to Bernard Montgomery.
Who is a leader? According to Rosalynn Carter, former First Lady of the USA, “A leader takes people where they want to go. A great leader takes people where they don’t necessarily want to go, but ought to be”.
It is easily discernible that a great leader is impelled by clear vision and driven by clear purpose. A great leader would be one that would take a country bogged by underdevelopment to the mountain top of sustainable development. Nigeria has lacked such visionary leaders since its journey of nationhood.
For the emergence of a great leader in Nigeria, these fundamental questions of who, why, when and how must be cleared answered. Who should emerge as a leader requires that there must be clear cut criteria.
The “why” question, requires that if there is no thorough process for electing worthy leaders, scoundrels will take over the leadership space and plaster the landscape with infamous outcome.
The “when” question, requires a period assessment and recruitment mechanism in which election is the most preferred process. The “how” question, requires collective involvement of all adult voters who would apply an effective voting system and process in determining the emergence of qualified candidates, and not by the elite godfathers or power brokers.
The people must hold major stake in the selection and election of leaders whom they are abreast with their pedigree. These form the plank of effective leadership recruitment process. Any process that defies this order is a travesty.
What we have in Nigeria is a parlous leadership recruitment process brokered through indecorous patronage system fostered by sleazy godfathers. They have monetized the political process in order to make it to be out of the reach of the upright individuals. The wrong people are always in power in Nigeria because the political process is skewed in favour of renegades with questionable sources of wealth with which they seamlessly bulldoze their way to power. Most of these people are sponsored into office by predatory godfathers and, in recouping their investments; they call the shots from outside.
This has been impeding development in Nigeria. To service the rapacious godfathers and power brokers, the so-called leaders forced upon the electorate ensure that a large chunk of funds meant for service delivery are squirreled away to gratify the power brokers or king makers at the detriment of the masses.
Because the leadership recruitment process in Nigeria fails to address the fundamental issues that drive good governance, bad examples of leadership are always orchestrated.
The colossal effect of poor leadership recruitment process in Nigeria is that it created social stratification in which the masses are disenfranchised from taking the lead in the election of their leaders. As a result, the allocation of resources falls under the purview of the elite minority.
According to Prof. Pat Utomi, “Very few people have been taking decisions over the resources of Nigeria because there had never been good elections” – Cf. Odisu (2017). Bad elections as we have had in Nigeria can never enthrone credible candidates. Only those with questionable character would emerge to pursue anti-people agenda.
That way, mediocrity rides on popular plaudit, while the unblemished candidates whom merit would have favoured are schemed out to make them wring their hands in despair. For the fact that all virtues inherent in meritocracy are shoved aside, money wears the pretension garb of virtue, and becomes the only qualifying criterion for leadership recruitment. But under no guise would sane person waste money for an opportunity to render selfless service.
The political parties are to blame here: they make the purchase of expression of interest forms and nomination forms to cost a fortune. Constitutionally, the practice of sale of expression of interest and nomination forms by political parties is illegal, and must not be allowed to continue.
Only politicians with ulterior motive and hidden agenda would commit their ill-gotten resources into an expensive venture like Nigerian politics and this is the reason why bad guys are always in power at the detriment of the masses that cannot unite to demystify their common enemies (Cf. Odisu, 2017).
In essence, morally bankrupt process is destructive and averse to development. It stands clearly against all known tenets of democracy.
No one who would want to serve the people would have to pay huge amount of money to do that. In totality, leadership should be service-oriented, and not warped to enthrone disservice.
The Way Out
Leadership and service go hand in hand. Those that choose leaders are the people – the direct beneficiaries of good governance. For true leaders to emerge, the recruitment process must be thorough. To return leadership recruitment process to the path of integrity in Nigeria, the people must be responsible in determining the leaders.
From the lowest level of leadership to the highest, candidates must be selected or elected on the basis of merit – consideration should be given to pedigree and competence.
Based on their track records, genuine leaders must be drawn from people who are qualified based on the laid down criteria, and they must be those that are already contented with their achievements in life, and are therefore ready to serve the people. Those that go into politics to pursue private wealth should be discouraged.
The argument in support of choosing people of integrity is that only credible people have a name to protect. Once the recruitment process tolerates the emergence of rouges at any level of leadership, then, political corruption will be the order of the day. Political corruption in our context here entails the use of power by government officials for illegitimate gain.
And we are well aware that a state of unrestrained political corruption is known as a kleptocracy, literally meaning “rule by thieves”.
The major aspects of political corruption that have stymied effective leadership in Nigeria include, but not restricted to: extortion, cronyism, nepotism, favouritism, renterism, patronage, graft and embezzlement. They remain forever, the enemies of good governance and development.
Conclusion
Without doubts, politics and its effects are pervasive. Thus, opinions and perceptions of political issues are all over the map, but there is always the lamentation that contemporary political life lacked leaders was commonplace (Steven F. Hayward, Churchill on leadership – Executive success in the face of adversity, New York, Gramercy Books 1998, p. viii).
Based on our arguments, there is not yet effective leadership recruitment in Nigeria. The political godfathers exploiting parlous electoral processes and procedures cordon off the political space against credible candidates to have a field day in recruiting morally bankrupt individuals to assume positions of leadership. The outcome of this travesty has been bad governance.
The path that our leadership recruitment process has travelled so far has not been effective. It has failed to yield good results. And in real life, it amounts to foolhardiness to repeat the same process that fails to turn out good results expecting a better outcome.
To counter the progress of bad leadership, Nigeria must sanitize its leadership recruitment agenda to ensure that only people with unquestionable pedigree and competence are allowed to be selected or elected as leaders.
Those with this onus of fostering effective leadership recruitment are the people who know better the suitable candidates for whatever leadership position. Potential leaders live with their people, and the people know them.
When the people are shortchanged in this noble endeavor by corrupt godfathers who exploit warped political process to deliver candidates with questionable reputation, then, Nigeria will forever experience ineffective leadership doldrums. However, it is only by means of effective leadership recruitment that Nigeria will experience good governance.
End.
GROpinion
Insecurity In Zamfara – Hold Lawal Accountable, Not Matawalle
Writes Nasiru Aliyu, Media Advisor to the Hon. Minister
The recent protest organized by the All Progressives Congress (APC) Akida Forum raises significant questions about political motivations and accountability.
Led by Musa Mahmoud the APC AKIDA group staged a demonstration at the Abuja headquarters of the Department of State Services (DSS), demanding an investigation into the Minister of State for Defence, Dr. Bello Mohammed Matawalle, amid allegations linking him to banditry in the state.
The protest, predominantly featuring hired women and youths from Abuja, was framed as a response to escalating security concerns in Zamfara.
However, the underlying motives appear to be rooted in political rivalry rather than genuine concern for public safety.
The leader of the APC Akida Forum Tijjani Ramallan claims that Governor Dauda Lawal has accused Matawalle of collusion with bandits, suggesting that such ties have perpetuated the insecurity plaguing the region.
A critical point overlooked by Mahmoud and his supporters is that Matawalle is no longer the executive governor of Zamfara.
The current governor, Dauda Lawal, now holds the title of the state’s chief security officer, and therefore, he bears the primary responsibility for addressing the security crisis.
Instead of engaging in a blame game, Lawal should focus on implementing effective strategies to combat the rampant insecurity and provide the dividends of democracy to the people of Zamfara state.
The animosity towards Matawalle seems to stem from his previous role as the Director General of Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s campaign in the Northwest, where he played a pivotal role in securing significant electoral support for the current president.
This success has reportedly fueled envy among some political figures like Tijjani Ramallan, including Musa Mahmoud and others who may feel threatened by Matawalle’s rising profile.
It is noteworthy that allegations against Matawalle have been investigated by the National Security Adviser’s office, which found no evidence to support claims of his involvement in banditry.
This investigation contributed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to retain Matawalle in his ministerial position, where he has reportedly managed security matters in the Northwest with professionalism.
Adding to the complexity of this situation, a Kano High Court recently issued a restraining order against Governor Lawal and others, prohibiting them from continuing their smear campaign against Matawalle. This legal development underscores the court’s recognition of the potential harm caused by unfounded allegations and the need for accountability in political discourse and the state government has found an ally in APC AKIDA led by Tijjani Ramallan.
Despite the court’s intervention, Governor Lawal continues to leverage media platforms to tarnish Matawalle’s reputation, linking him to banditry and corruption without substantiating evidence.
Such tactics appear to be desperate attempts to undermine Matawalle’s credibility, likely motivated by Lawal’s desire to solidify his political standing.
The ongoing campaign against Matawalle by Lawal and his associates raises serious concerns about the integrity of political discourse in Zamfara.
It is imperative for the public to remain vigilant against misleading narratives and to recognize the broader implications of such political maneuvers.
The Kano High Court’s ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and the need for responsible governance.
In conclusion, the focus of accountability in Zamfara should shift towards Governor Dauda Lawal, who now holds the reins of security in the state.
Instead of casting blame on former officials, Lawal must take ownership of the security situation and work towards tangible solutions that prioritize the safety and well-being of the people of Zamfara.
Furthermore, since Matawalle operational visit to sokoto led to the elimination of Bandit leader Halilu Sububu who is alleged to have died with the treasure of the sponsors of banditry in zamfara state, the pain propelled them to further embark on campaign of calumny.
The recent activities of some individuals with one Davids Iyida attempting to sabotage the MoMo Payment Service Bank project intended to benefit, especially Enugu Ezike people, have raised significant concern and outrage within the community.
Such actions aimed at undermining a project with immense potential to uplift and empower the people of Enugu Ezike can only be described as malicious.
The MoMo PSB project is designed to bring financial services closer to the people of Enugu Ezike, facilitating easier access to banking and financial transactions.
This project is expected to create jobs, stimulate local businesses, and provide a much-needed boost to the local economy. In a region where such opportunities are rare, the MoMo PSB project represents a beacon of hope for many residents.
It is particularly baffling and disheartening to witness a member of the community collaborate with outsiders to hinder the progress of their own people.
The reasons behind such alliances remain unclear, but the impact of these actions is evident and deeply troubling. Working to obstruct the project is not only delaying progress but also actively working against the welfare and advancement of Enugu Ezike.
The efforts to destroy Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu’s good intention, despite all the positive contributions he has made, are nothing short of wickedness.
Adonu, a visionary entrepreneur and the leading MTN Partner in the South East, has dedicated significant resources and efforts to bring the MoMo Payment Service Bank project to fruition.
His vision for the community includes economic growth, financial inclusion, and overall development. Attacking his vision is an attack on the progress and future of Enugu Ezike.
The question that lingers in the minds of many is: Why sabotaging our own benefits? In a time when unity and collective effort are paramount for the community’s advancement, such actions of sabotage are counterproductive and harmful. The community needs all hands on deck to drive development and improve the quality of life for its residents. Internal conflicts and malicious actions only serve to set back these efforts.
Despite the challenges and the malicious attempts to derail the project, it is important to reaffirm that S Mobile Group vision for establishing a MoMo Payment Service Bank in Enugu Ezike will prevail.
The community stands behind this vision, recognizing the immense benefits it promises to bring. Efforts to hinder progress will ultimately fail in the face of collective determination and support.
The actions of these ungrateful individuals, aimed at sabotaging the MoMo PSB project, are grave disservice to the community of Enugu Ezike.
In a time when progress and development are desperately needed, such malicious activities are deeply regrettable.
However, the vision and determination of Kingsley Ifeanyi Adonu and the community’s support ensure that the project will succeed, bringing much-needed growth and prosperity to Enugu Ezike.
Let it be known that no amount of sabotage can dim the light of progress and unity.
Nwodo, a public commentator writes from Enugu State
Columnists
Cybersecurity in 2024: Towards Ever Greater Sophistication of Tactics
Writer: CHESTER WISNIEWSKI, Director Global Field CTO, Sophos
With 2024 fast approaching, what are the results for 2023 and what are the developments in the threat landscape for this new year?
The year 2023 was marked by persistence in the tactics of cybercriminals, with the predominance of ransomware, the exploitation of vulnerabilities, theft of credentials and even attacks targeting the supply chain. The common point in all his attacks is their formidable effectiveness.
It is therefore essential to ask what trends will persist in 2024 and what strategies businesses should adopt to deal with these future cyber threats.
Between persistent trends and evolving cybercrime tactics
In 2024, the threat landscape is not expected to change radically, particularly with regard to attack typologies and criminal tactics and procedures.
Criminal groups still primarily focus their attention on financial gains and ransomware remains their weapon of choice. These cybercriminals tend to take the easy way out by opportunistically attacking unpatched security vulnerabilities.
The recent Citrix Bleed attack demonstrated the agility of cybercriminals when it comes to quickly and effectively exploiting these new vulnerabilities.
However, once patches are applied to these vulnerabilities, cyberattackers tend to revert to more common strategies of stealing credentials or, failing that, cookies or session cookies, which, while slightly slower, constitute always a proven means that allows them to penetrate within a system.
In 2024, however, we should expect increased sophistication in defense evasion tactics, particularly due to the generalization of certain technologies such as multi-factor authentication. These attacks will combine malicious proxy servers, social engineering techniques and repeated authentication request attacks or “fatigue attacks”.
AI and regulations will continue to shape cybersecurity
In 2024, the development of AI will have a positive impact on the efficiency of IT teams and security teams by enabling them to strengthen defenses and work more efficiently, including through the processing of vast volumes of data in the aim of detecting anomalies. It should make it possible to respond more quickly in the event of an incident.
Indeed, analysis of attacks in 2023 showed a shortening of the time between network penetration and the triggering of a final attack – using malware or ransomware. The need for rapid detection and response tools to prevent costly incidents is therefore essential.
Finally, regulatory developments could have a major influence on measures taken against ransomware. The need to take more substantial measures could push some states to penalize the payment of ransoms, which would represent a brake on malicious actors and change the perspective of companies in the event of an attack.
Other stricter legislation, such as the implementation of the European NIS2 Directive, is also expected to force companies to take additional measures, particularly regarding their abilities to collect data sets.
To protect themselves against increasingly rapid, effective and costly attacks, companies will need to strengthen their defenses by equipping themselves with tools that allow them to detect and respond to incidents more quickly.
The worsening cybersecurity talent shortage does not appear to be as serious as some studies claim. On the contrary, companies have implemented more lax hiring criteria and more open-mindedness in the recruitment process.
From this perspective, to guarantee their survival in a constantly evolving threat landscape, companies have every interest in establishing partnerships with cybersecurity experts whose main mission is to make the hyperconnected world safer, to advise and assist them. in setting up effective defenses.
-
Spotlight2 days ago
Niger Delta Congress Rejects ‘Annexation’ of Region by Simon Ekpa at ‘Biafra Declaration Day’
-
GRPolitics1 day ago
Centre for CSR West Africa calls on Political Parties to embrace Sustainable Leadership
-
News23 hours ago
We Received N80,000 Minimum Wage in November – Enugu Labour Leaders